Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Objective depth-of-focus is different from subjective depth-of-focus and correlated with accommodative microfluctuations |
| Authors: |
Yao, Peijun1, Lin, Huiling2, Huang, Jia1, Chu, Renyuan1, Jiang, Bai-chuan1,3 bjiang@nova.edu |
| Source: |
Vision Research. Jun2010, Vol. 50 Issue 13, p1266-1273. 8p. |
| Subjects: |
Visual accommodation, Vision research, Visual perception, Saccadic eye movements, Visual learning, Sensitivity analysis |
| Abstract: |
Abstract: In this study, we investigated whether the objective depth-of-focus (DOF) is different from the subjective DOF and whether it correlates to accommodative microfluctuations (AMF). The objective DOF and subjective DOF at 1.5 D accommodative stimulus (AS) level were compared in the same group of subjects. The objective DOF and magnitude of AMF were measured at 5 AS levels from 0 D to 4 D. Results showed that there was a significant difference and no correlation between the objective DOF and the subjective DOF. The objective DOF was correlated to the magnitude of AMF. The results suggest that objective DOF and subjective DOF represent the blur sensitivity of two different systems. AMF are correlated with the blur sensitivity of the accommodative system. [Copyright &y& Elsevier] |
|
Copyright of Vision Research is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Engineering Source |
