Physiological interpretation of inductance and low-resistance terms in four-element windkessel models: Assessment by generalized sensitivity function analysis
Saved in:
| Title: | Physiological interpretation of inductance and low-resistance terms in four-element windkessel models: Assessment by generalized sensitivity function analysis |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Burattini, Roberto1,2 r.burattini@univpm.it, Bini, Silvia1 |
| Source: | Medical Engineering & Physics. Jul2011, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p739-754. 16p. |
| Subjects: | Sensitivity analysis, Heart beat, Viscoelasticity, Parameter estimation, Mechanical impedance, Blood flow |
| Abstract: | Abstract: Physiological relevance of parameters of three arterial models, denominated W4P, W4S and IVW, was assessed by computation of parameter-related generalized sensitivity functions (GSFs), which allow the definition of heart-cycle time intervals where the information content of experimental data, useful for estimation of each model parameter, is concentrated. The W4P and W4S are derived from the three-element windkessel by connecting an inductance, L, in parallel or in series, respectively, with aortic characteristic impedance, R c . In the IVW, L is placed in series at the input of a viscoelastic windkessel, incorporating a Voigt cell (a resistor, R d , in series with a capacitor, C). Pressure and flow measured in the ascending aorta of five ferrets and five dogs were used to estimate all model parameters, by fitting to pressure. For each model structure, parameter-related GSFs were generated. Focusing on controversial L, R c and R d physical meaning, our GSF analysis yielded the conclusion that, in both the W4S and the IVW, but not in the W4P, the L-term is suitable to represent the inertial properties of blood motion. Moreover, the meaning of aortic characteristic impedance ascribed to R c is questionable; while R d is likely to account for viscous losses of arterial wall motion. [Copyright &y& Elsevier] |
| Copyright of Medical Engineering & Physics is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| Abstract: | Abstract: Physiological relevance of parameters of three arterial models, denominated W4P, W4S and IVW, was assessed by computation of parameter-related generalized sensitivity functions (GSFs), which allow the definition of heart-cycle time intervals where the information content of experimental data, useful for estimation of each model parameter, is concentrated. The W4P and W4S are derived from the three-element windkessel by connecting an inductance, L, in parallel or in series, respectively, with aortic characteristic impedance, R c . In the IVW, L is placed in series at the input of a viscoelastic windkessel, incorporating a Voigt cell (a resistor, R d , in series with a capacitor, C). Pressure and flow measured in the ascending aorta of five ferrets and five dogs were used to estimate all model parameters, by fitting to pressure. For each model structure, parameter-related GSFs were generated. Focusing on controversial L, R c and R d physical meaning, our GSF analysis yielded the conclusion that, in both the W4S and the IVW, but not in the W4P, the L-term is suitable to represent the inertial properties of blood motion. Moreover, the meaning of aortic characteristic impedance ascribed to R c is questionable; while R d is likely to account for viscous losses of arterial wall motion. [Copyright &y& Elsevier] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 13504533 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.01.012 |
