Variety is the spice of life: combining soft and hard OR/MS methods.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Variety is the spice of life: combining soft and hard OR/MS methods.
Authors: Mingers, John
Source: International Transactions in Operational Research. Nov2000, Vol. 7 Issue 6, p673. 19p.
Subjects: Computer systems management, Problem solving
Abstract: Some observers have expressed concern over the state of the OR/MS profession, especially as to its failure to tackle complex, messy problems. One response has been to develop various “soft” methods (also called “problem structuring methods”) that focus on the human and political aspects of OR/MS interventions. Recent work, both theoretical and practitioner-based, involves the combination of several methods in a particular project (multimethod). Often the combination includes both hard (quantitative) and soft (qualitative) approaches. This paper illustrates the utility of soft methods, and in particular their combination, with recently published case studies. It then proposes an approach to the process of combining methods, including several frameworks and techniques to assist in selecting and linking different methods. Finally, it discusses future research in this field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Transactions in Operational Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:Some observers have expressed concern over the state of the OR/MS profession, especially as to its failure to tackle complex, messy problems. One response has been to develop various “soft” methods (also called “problem structuring methods”) that focus on the human and political aspects of OR/MS interventions. Recent work, both theoretical and practitioner-based, involves the combination of several methods in a particular project (multimethod). Often the combination includes both hard (quantitative) and soft (qualitative) approaches. This paper illustrates the utility of soft methods, and in particular their combination, with recently published case studies. It then proposes an approach to the process of combining methods, including several frameworks and techniques to assist in selecting and linking different methods. Finally, it discusses future research in this field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:09696016
DOI:10.1111/j.1475-3995.2000.tb00224.x