Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
A response to Jason et al. (2009), 'Evaluating the Centers for Disease Control's empirical chronic fatigue syndrome case definition'. |
| Authors: |
Reeves WC (AUTHOR), Gurbaxani BM (AUTHOR), Lin JS (AUTHOR), Unger ER (AUTHOR) |
| Source: |
Journal of Disability Policy Studies. Mar2010, Vol. 20 Issue 4, p229-232. 4p. |
| Abstract: |
The recent article by Jason, Najar, Porter, and Reh, 'Evaluating the Centers for Disease Control's Empirical Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Case Definition' (2009; Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 20:2, 93DL100) attempted to critically explore several pertinent issues concerning diagnosing chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Most of these issues have been brewing since international adoption of the 1994 CFS case definition by Fukuda et al., and it is high time to address them in a peer-reviewed and public forum. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Disability Policy Studies is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Education Research Complete |
