Tell me why... The influence of self-involvement on short term smoking behaviour.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Tell me why... The influence of self-involvement on short term smoking behaviour.
Authors: Müller BC (AUTHOR), van Baaren RB (AUTHOR), Ritter SM (AUTHOR), Woud ML (AUTHOR), Bergmann H (AUTHOR), Harakeh Z (AUTHOR), Engels RC (AUTHOR), Dijksterhuis A (AUTHOR)
Source: Addictive Behaviors. May2009, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p427-431. 5p.
Abstract: Previous studies found that information is more persuasive when self-generated (high self-involvement), rather than when simply read or heard (low self-involvement). In two studies, we investigated whether differences in self-involvement concerning smoking issues would influence immediate smoking behaviour. As predicted, results indicate that participants who developed their own arguments against smoking waited longer before lighting up a cigarette than those who read arguments against smoking that were developed by other participants (Study 1). Further, participants who additionally generated their own arguments were less likely to smoke within 30 min than those who read prepared arguments against smoking (Study 2). In sum, our studies illustrate that personal involvement in generating anti-smoking arguments can reduce short term smoking behaviour. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Addictive Behaviors is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:Previous studies found that information is more persuasive when self-generated (high self-involvement), rather than when simply read or heard (low self-involvement). In two studies, we investigated whether differences in self-involvement concerning smoking issues would influence immediate smoking behaviour. As predicted, results indicate that participants who developed their own arguments against smoking waited longer before lighting up a cigarette than those who read arguments against smoking that were developed by other participants (Study 1). Further, participants who additionally generated their own arguments were less likely to smoke within 30 min than those who read prepared arguments against smoking (Study 2). In sum, our studies illustrate that personal involvement in generating anti-smoking arguments can reduce short term smoking behaviour. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:03064603
DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.12.016