Design, conduct and evaluation of a communication course for oncology fellows.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Design, conduct and evaluation of a communication course for oncology fellows.
Authors: Lenzi R (AUTHOR), Baile WF (AUTHOR), Berek J (AUTHOR), Back A (AUTHOR), Buckman R (AUTHOR), Cohen L (AUTHOR), Parker PA (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Cancer Education. Fall2005, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p143-149. 7p.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Training in the communication components of cancer care is necessary for the practice of oncology. We conducted a communication course for oncology fellows. METHODS: Teaching methods included lectures, role playing and simulated patient interviews. We used self-reports, knowledge questionnaires and course/faculty evaluations. RESULTS: A total of 17 fellows participated. Skills in dealing with bad news, denial and end-of-life issues improved. We obtained information on communication tasks commonly performed during patient interactions, various aspects of the course and faculty performance. CONCLUSIONS: Fellows' knowledge and self-efficacy improved postcourse. Information on challenges faced by trainees and their feedback may help focus the design of future courses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Cancer Education is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
URL: 18191515
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Training in the communication components of cancer care is necessary for the practice of oncology. We conducted a communication course for oncology fellows. METHODS: Teaching methods included lectures, role playing and simulated patient interviews. We used self-reports, knowledge questionnaires and course/faculty evaluations. RESULTS: A total of 17 fellows participated. Skills in dealing with bad news, denial and end-of-life issues improved. We obtained information on communication tasks commonly performed during patient interactions, various aspects of the course and faculty performance. CONCLUSIONS: Fellows' knowledge and self-efficacy improved postcourse. Information on challenges faced by trainees and their feedback may help focus the design of future courses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:08858195
DOI:10.1207/s15430154jce2003_7