Student Achievement in an Equine Science Class: A Comparison of Lecture and Lab-based Outcomes.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Student Achievement in an Equine Science Class: A Comparison of Lecture and Lab-based Outcomes.
Authors: Adams-Pope, B.1 brittany.adamspope@louisville.edu, Duncan, D.2 dwd@uga.edu, Turner, K.2 kturner@uga.edu, Fuhrman, N.2 fuhrman@uga.edu
Source: NACTA Journal. Mar2016, Vol. 60 Issue 1, p22-26. 5p.
Subject Terms: *Academic achievement research, *Discussion in education, *Lectures & lecturing in universities & colleges, *Education, Horses, Horse owners
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of exposure to lab-based instruction to lecture-based instruction on student achievement as evidenced by test scores. Pre and post-tests were administered at the beginning and end of a 15-week long semester and student demographics, including previous experience with horses and horse ownership, were used to further examine the data. Both methods revealed increases in student test scores, but the lecture-based method showed a greater increase. The lab environment may have distracted the students and influenced the marginal growth in test scores for students participating in the labs. Students who owned horses may have already been familiar with the barn environment and been distracted (disengaged) with the information being shared in lab. The newness of the barn environment may have distracted non-horse owners from fully engaging with the content being shared in lab and resulted in little growth in test scores. These results suggest that equine labs may be more effective if separated into beginner and experienced sections. Additional research is needed to further understand this phenomenon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of NACTA Journal is the property of North American Colleges & Teachers of Agriculture and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of exposure to lab-based instruction to lecture-based instruction on student achievement as evidenced by test scores. Pre and post-tests were administered at the beginning and end of a 15-week long semester and student demographics, including previous experience with horses and horse ownership, were used to further examine the data. Both methods revealed increases in student test scores, but the lecture-based method showed a greater increase. The lab environment may have distracted the students and influenced the marginal growth in test scores for students participating in the labs. Students who owned horses may have already been familiar with the barn environment and been distracted (disengaged) with the information being shared in lab. The newness of the barn environment may have distracted non-horse owners from fully engaging with the content being shared in lab and resulted in little growth in test scores. These results suggest that equine labs may be more effective if separated into beginner and experienced sections. Additional research is needed to further understand this phenomenon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:01494910