Practicing Community-Based Truku (Indigenous) Language Policy: Reflection on Dialogue and Collaboration.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Practicing Community-Based Truku (Indigenous) Language Policy: Reflection on Dialogue and Collaboration.
Authors: Lin, Man-Chiu1 mlin16@asu.edu, Yudaw, Bowtung
Source: Asia-Pacific Education Researcher (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.). Dec2016, Vol. 25 Issue 5/6, p753-762. 10p. 1 Color Photograph, 2 Charts.
Subject Terms: *Language policy, *Policy sciences, *Critical pedagogy, Truku (Taiwan people)
Geographic Terms: Taiwan
Abstract: This study focuses on one Truku (Indigenous) village in eastern Taiwan and aims to understand the processes and possibilities of bottom-up language policy formation and implementation. In 2012, the first author assisted the villagers to start a community-driven language revitalization initiative. Drawing on scholarship guided by critical Indigenous research methodologies, and critical sociocultural approaches to language policy and planning, this paper continues the conversation about the complex and dynamic processes of collaboration and relationship building in developing bottom-up language revitalization. Affirming the role of relationship in collaboration, the study argues that it is the dialogue of individuals' intersecting social positions that makes relationship building possible. The newly developed relationship further transforms each other's position(s) in praxis. As the dichotomy between the researched and the researchers is blurred, the authors further argue that the relationship comes along with responsibility, challenging the silenced dialogue of 'exiting' in traditional research ethics. Methodologically, this study contributes to the scholarship of language policy and planning by exploring an alternative, democratic, humanizing way of doing language policy and planning research that prioritizes local knowledge, voice, and engagement. Additionally, drawn from Indigenous epistemology, the recognition of human relationships in praxis critically features the affective dimension of LPP, offering a more holistic and developmental understanding of the process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Asia-Pacific Education Researcher (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.) is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first