Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Sexual regret in US and Norway: Effects of culture and individual differences in religiosity and mating strategy. |
| Authors: |
Bendixen, Mons1, Asao, Kelly2, Wyckoff, Joy P.2, Buss, David M.2, Kennair, Leif Edward Ottesen1 kennair@ntnu.no |
| Source: |
Personality & Individual Differences. Oct2017, Vol. 116, p246-251. 6p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*Culture, *Individual differences, Sexual intercourse, Human sexuality, Cross-cultural differences |
| Abstract: |
Sexual regret was investigated across two disparate cultures: Norway (N = 853), a highly secular and sexually liberal culture, and the United States (N = 466), a more religious and more sexually conservative culture. Sex differences, individual differences in preferred mating strategy, religiosity, and cultural differences in sexual regret were analyzed. Men were significantly less likely to regret having had casual sex than women and were significantly more likely to regret passing up casual sexual opportunities than women. Participants who were more religious regretted having had casual sex more and regretted passing up casual sex less. Sexually unrestricted participants were less likely to regret having had casual sex and were more likely to regret passing up casual sex. Finally, North Americans and Norwegians did not differ significantly in overall amount of sexual regret nor in patterns of sex differences in sexual regret. Discussion focuses the robustness of sex differences across cultures, the importance of explaining individual differences within cultures, and on future directions for cross-cultural research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Personality & Individual Differences is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Education Research Complete |