Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Language Development and Impairment in Children With Mild to Moderate Sensorineural Hearing Loss. |
| Authors: |
Halliday, Lorna F.1 (AUTHOR) l.halliday@ucl.ac.uk, Tuomainen, Outi1 (AUTHOR), Rosen, Stuart1 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: |
Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research. Jun2017, Vol. 60 Issue 6, p1551-1567. 17p. 6 Charts, 1 Graph. |
| Subject Terms: |
*Deaf children, *Language testing of children, *Phonological awareness, *Reading ability testing, *Children's language, *Language disorders, *Communicative competence, *Comparative studies, *Comparative grammar, *Intelligence tests, *Language acquisition, *Memory, *Reading, *Speech evaluation, *Vocabulary, *Data analysis, *Children, Language, Vocabulary ability testing, Hard of hearing children, Non-Verbal Ability Tests, Analysis of covariance, Audiometric equipment, Chi-squared test, Confidence intervals, Sensorineural hearing loss, Hearing aids, Hearing aid fitting, Hearing levels, Neuropsychological tests, Phonetics, Probability theory, Questionnaires, Research funding, Statistics, Mathematical variables, Sample size (Statistics), Effect sizes (Statistics), Severity of illness index, Descriptive statistics, Odds ratio, Psychology |
| Geographic Terms: |
England |
| Abstract: |
Purpose: The goal of this study was to examine language development and factors related to language impairments in children with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss (MMHL). Method: Ninety children, aged 8–16 years (46 children with MMHL; 44 aged-matched controls), were administered a battery of standardized language assessments, including measures of phonological processing, receptive and expressive vocabulary and grammar, word and nonword reading, and parental report of communication skills. Group differences were examined after controlling for nonverbal ability. Results: Children with MMHL performed as well as controls on receptive vocabulary and word and nonword reading. They also performed within normal limits, albeit significantly worse than controls, on expressive vocabulary, and on receptive and expressive grammar, and worse than both controls and standardized norms on phonological processing and parental report of communication skills. However, there was considerable variation in performance, with 26% showing evidence of clinically significant oral or written language impairments. Poor performance was not linked to severity of hearing loss nor age of diagnosis. Rather, outcomes were related to nonverbal ability, maternal education, and presence/absence of family history of language problems. Conclusions: Clinically significant language impairments are not an inevitable consequence of MMHL. Risk factors appear to include lower maternal education and family history of language problems, whereas nonverbal ability may constitute a protective factor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Education Research Complete |
