Households’ valuation of new broadband networks.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Households’ valuation of new broadband networks.
Authors: Thomas, Dominic1,2 dominic.thomas@monash.edu, Finn, Adam1,2 adam.finn@ualberta.ca
Source: Internet Research. 2018, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p675-695. 21p.
Subject Terms: *Digital divide, *Communication, Electronic services, Internet in public administration, Households
Abstract: Purpose While governments have invested in broadband infrastructure to ensure universal access, researchers argue that infrastructure alone does not guarantee internet use. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effectiveness of one such government initiative on households’ internet adoption and use.Design/methodology/approach The authors used data from 2002 to 2014, including two choice experiment surveys and broadband access and subscription data.Findings The results of Survey 1 show that urban households valued existing e-services more than rural households, indicating the importance of government investment in broadband access. The results of Survey 2 show that when a publicly funded new broadband network equalized access costs, rural households valued overall e-services more than urban households, highlighting the dual role of access to e-services and their perceived benefits. Importantly, these results suggest that rural households resist social change, which lowers their valuation of certain new publicly funded e-services.Research limitations/implications These findings extend the digital divide literature by providing empirical support for the applicability of the global village vs urban leadership framework in households’ valuations of e-services.Practical implications While the government has worked diligently to enhance access, it also needs to focus on the types of content and services and better communication with communities.Originality/value Recent research has focused on inequities in skills and usage, not internet access. Furthermore, the authors examined the inequality in benefits of access to meaningful e-services and better communication with beneficiaries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Internet Research is the property of Emerald Publishing Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:Purpose While governments have invested in broadband infrastructure to ensure universal access, researchers argue that infrastructure alone does not guarantee internet use. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effectiveness of one such government initiative on households’ internet adoption and use.Design/methodology/approach The authors used data from 2002 to 2014, including two choice experiment surveys and broadband access and subscription data.Findings The results of Survey 1 show that urban households valued existing e-services more than rural households, indicating the importance of government investment in broadband access. The results of Survey 2 show that when a publicly funded new broadband network equalized access costs, rural households valued overall e-services more than urban households, highlighting the dual role of access to e-services and their perceived benefits. Importantly, these results suggest that rural households resist social change, which lowers their valuation of certain new publicly funded e-services.Research limitations/implications These findings extend the digital divide literature by providing empirical support for the applicability of the global village vs urban leadership framework in households’ valuations of e-services.Practical implications While the government has worked diligently to enhance access, it also needs to focus on the types of content and services and better communication with communities.Originality/value Recent research has focused on inequities in skills and usage, not internet access. Furthermore, the authors examined the inequality in benefits of access to meaningful e-services and better communication with beneficiaries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:10662243
DOI:10.1108/IntR-10-2016-0317