Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
The effect of individual task conflict on employee creativity: A moderated mediation model. |
| Authors: |
Li, Ci-Rong1 (AUTHOR) cirongli@gmail.com, Li, Chun-Xuan1 (AUTHOR) d9532001@gmail.com, Lin, Chen-Ju2 (AUTHOR) jzlin0208@gmail.com |
| Source: |
Thinking Skills & Creativity. Mar2019, Vol. 31, p112-124. 13p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*Information processing, *Creative ability, Conflict theory, Multilevel models, Reflexivity, Leadership |
| Abstract: |
Highlights • Employee information elaboration plays a mediator linking individual task conflict and individual creativity. • There are curvilinear relationships between individual task conflict and both individual creativity and employee information elaboration. • The curvilinear relationship between individual task conflict and employee information elaboration was moderated by team reflexivity. Abstract Adopting conflict as a multilevel phenomenon, we theorized and tested how and when individual level task conflict relates to individual creativity. Integrating the motivated information processing view of conflict with social self-preservation theory, we make the case for employee information elaboration being the mediator between individual task conflict and individual creativity. Multisource data were collected from 374 members and their leaders within 57 engineering teams. The results indicated that individual task conflict was positively related to individual creativity through employee information elaboration. Furthermore, we found a curvilinear relationship that individual task conflict has with both individual creativity and employee information elaboration. Finally, we also found that the curvilinear relationship between individual task conflict and employee information elaboration was moderated by team reflexivity, such that a positive relationship was strengthened and a negative relationship weakened, in higher team reflexivity, but not in lower team reflexivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Thinking Skills & Creativity is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Education Research Complete |