Autorregulación del aprendizaje y procesos de evaluación formativa en los trabajos en grupo.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Autorregulación del aprendizaje y procesos de evaluación formativa en los trabajos en grupo.
Alternate Title: Self-regulated learning and formative assessment process on group work.
Authors: Fraile, J.1 juan.fraile@ufv.es, Gil-Izquierdo, M.2 maria.gil@uam.es, Zamorano-Sande, D.3 davidzamoranosande@gmail.com, Sánchez-Iglesias, I.4 i.sanchez@psi.ucm.es
Source: RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa. 2020, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p1-15. 15p.
Subject Terms: *Self-regulated learning, *Formative tests, *Cognitive styles, Teams in the workplace, Quantitative research
Abstract (English): This study aimed to design and implement a formative assessment context for a group assignment. This setting is based on self-regulated learning, the beneficial practices exposed in the literature and the challenges for the next decade. We carried out quantitative research using two questionnaires to measure self-regulated learning skills and the way of working as a group. The participants were 88 students getting a degree in Sports Sciences. Results showed that the reported way of working in groups has no impact on performance. Furthermore, higher self-regulation in their learning style and the use of assessment criteria led to higher performance. We did not find any differences regarding avoidance self-regulation style. We discuss theoretical and educational implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Spanish): El objetivo de este estudio fue diseñar e implementar un contexto de evaluación formativa sobre un trabajo en grupo basado en la autorregulación del aprendizaje a través de las prácticas beneficiosas que expone la literatura y los retos que se plantean de cara a la próxima década. Se llevó a cabo una investigación cuantitativa a través de dos cuestionarios que midieron la capacidad de autorregulación y la forma de trabajar en grupo, con 88 estudiantes del Grado en Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Depor te. Los resultados muestran que la forma de trabajar en equipo reportada por los estudiantes no tuvo un impacto en la calificación obtenida en su trabajo. Por otro lado, una mayor capacidad de autorregulación en su estilo de aprendizaje y un mayor empleo d e los criterios de evaluación resultaron significativos, alcanzando una calificación superior. No se encontraron diferencias en relación con la dimensión de evitación de la autorregulación. Se discuten las implicaciones teóricas y educativas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa is the property of RELIEVE - Revista Electonica de Investigacion y Evaluacion Educativa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:This study aimed to design and implement a formative assessment context for a group assignment. This setting is based on self-regulated learning, the beneficial practices exposed in the literature and the challenges for the next decade. We carried out quantitative research using two questionnaires to measure self-regulated learning skills and the way of working as a group. The participants were 88 students getting a degree in Sports Sciences. Results showed that the reported way of working in groups has no impact on performance. Furthermore, higher self-regulation in their learning style and the use of assessment criteria led to higher performance. We did not find any differences regarding avoidance self-regulation style. We discuss theoretical and educational implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:11344032
DOI:10.7203/relieve.26.1.17402