Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Dr. Uhre et al. Reply. |
| Authors: |
Uhre, Valdemar Funch1 (AUTHOR), Uhre, Camilla Funch2 (AUTHOR), Lønfeldt, Nicole Nadine3 (AUTHOR), Pretzmann, Linea3 (AUTHOR), Vangkilde, Signe2 (AUTHOR), Plessen, Kerstin Jessica4 (AUTHOR), Gluud, Christian5 (AUTHOR), Jakobsen, Janus Christian6 (AUTHOR), Pagsberg, Anne Katrine2 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: |
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. Jul2020, Vol. 59 Issue 7, p787-791. 5p. |
| Abstract: |
In a recent letter to the editor, a group of clinician-researchers posit that the conclusions in our published systematic review1 on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are based on inappropriate methodology. In this reply, we address the concerns expressed by Storch et al.2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Education Research Complete |
