View in EDS

The impact of oil palm on rural livelihoods and tropical forest landscapes in Latin America.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The impact of oil palm on rural livelihoods and tropical forest landscapes in Latin America.
Authors: Castellanos-Navarrete, A.1 (AUTHOR) acastela@unam.mx, de Castro, F.2 (AUTHOR), Pacheco, P.3 (AUTHOR)
Source: Journal of Rural Studies. Jan2021, Vol. 81, p294-304. 11p.
Subject Terms: Deforestation, Tropical forests, Rural poor, Forest policy, Rural population, Landscapes, Market design & structure (Economics), Property rights
Geographic Terms: Nicaragua
Abstract: Does oil palm boost agricultural growth and reduce rural poverty, or is it a threat to rural livelihoods and tropical forest landscapes? This paper introduces a Special Issue on this question, focusing on Latin America. It reviews available literature and data for countries where oil palm either covers large areas (Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Honduras) or has recently expanded (Costa Rica, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru), and presents evidence from nine case studies (including Nicaragua). Combining political economy with a livelihood approach, this article discusses how dissimilar policies supporting oil palm combined with contrasting agrarian change dynamics, market structures, and institutional arrangements driving rural inclusion (and exclusion) in oil palm production have resulted in a variety of expansion trajectories (ranging from smallholder-to plantation-based, plus mixed forms in between) and outcomes across the region. Main findings show that rural livelihoods and landscapes are most threatened where industrial plantations predominate, particularly in weakly governed forest frontiers, while oil palm is beneficial where policies guarantee land access and support smallholders. However, policies that are beneficial to smallholders do not preclude conflicts between oil palm smallholders (often migrant settlers) and forest-dependent (indigenous and Afro-descendant) communities opposing this industry. • Oil palm expansion is shaped by wider political economies and development policies. • Market-based development policies have favored large-scale over smallholder production. • Benefits from oil palm are unevenly distributed across rural population. • Violence across forest frontiers has fueled conflicts linked to oil palm. • Weak forest governance has led to significant deforestation by industrial plantations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Rural Studies is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:Does oil palm boost agricultural growth and reduce rural poverty, or is it a threat to rural livelihoods and tropical forest landscapes? This paper introduces a Special Issue on this question, focusing on Latin America. It reviews available literature and data for countries where oil palm either covers large areas (Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Honduras) or has recently expanded (Costa Rica, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru), and presents evidence from nine case studies (including Nicaragua). Combining political economy with a livelihood approach, this article discusses how dissimilar policies supporting oil palm combined with contrasting agrarian change dynamics, market structures, and institutional arrangements driving rural inclusion (and exclusion) in oil palm production have resulted in a variety of expansion trajectories (ranging from smallholder-to plantation-based, plus mixed forms in between) and outcomes across the region. Main findings show that rural livelihoods and landscapes are most threatened where industrial plantations predominate, particularly in weakly governed forest frontiers, while oil palm is beneficial where policies guarantee land access and support smallholders. However, policies that are beneficial to smallholders do not preclude conflicts between oil palm smallholders (often migrant settlers) and forest-dependent (indigenous and Afro-descendant) communities opposing this industry. • Oil palm expansion is shaped by wider political economies and development policies. • Market-based development policies have favored large-scale over smallholder production. • Benefits from oil palm are unevenly distributed across rural population. • Violence across forest frontiers has fueled conflicts linked to oil palm. • Weak forest governance has led to significant deforestation by industrial plantations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:07430167
DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.047