Majorism: Neoliberalism in Student Culture.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Majorism: Neoliberalism in Student Culture.
Authors: Carrigan, Coleen1 cmcarrig@calpoly.edu, Bardini, Michelle1
Source: Anthropology & Education Quarterly. Mar2021, Vol. 52 Issue 1, p42-62. 21p.
Subject Terms: *College students, *College environment, *Ideology, *Technology education, *Science education, Neoliberalism, Ethnology research
Abstract: Declining support for US higher education and the corporatization of this institution shape students' experiences. This ethnography describes a campus culture stratified by an ideology called "majorism." Majorism, a term particular to this study's site, is the preferential treatment of science and technology over the Liberal Arts. By understanding majorism through the lived experiences of undergraduates, we can better understand what the US academy values, its purpose, and whom it does and does not serve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Anthropology & Education Quarterly is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Declining support for US higher education and the corporatization of this institution shape students' experiences. This ethnography describes a campus culture stratified by an ideology called "majorism." Majorism, a term particular to this study's site, is the preferential treatment of science and technology over the Liberal Arts. By understanding majorism through the lived experiences of undergraduates, we can better understand what the US academy values, its purpose, and whom it does and does not serve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:01617761
DOI:10.1111/aeq.12361