The Relation between the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Special Education Research: A Systematic Review.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Relation between the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Special Education Research: A Systematic Review.
Authors: Lewis, Maria M.1 (AUTHOR), Burke, Megan M.2 (AUTHOR), Decker, Janet R.3 (AUTHOR)
Source: American Journal of Education. May2021, Vol. 127 Issue 3, p345-368. 24p. 2 Charts, 1 Graph.
Subject Terms: *Special education, *Education research, *Acting education, *People with disabilities
Abstract: Because the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) delineates much of the substantive and procedural dimensions of special education practice, it seems logical that IDEA should be an integral part of special education research. Yet, to what extent do special education researchers discuss IDEA? In this study, we systematically reviewed every article published in a 10-year time frame in three special education journals (N = 887). Only 23.1% of the articles had explicit implications for IDEA. Most implications were tied to the compliance of IDEA as opposed to how IDEA could be improved. The disconnect between research and law has significant implications for research, policy, and practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of American Journal of Education is the property of University of Chicago and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:Because the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) delineates much of the substantive and procedural dimensions of special education practice, it seems logical that IDEA should be an integral part of special education research. Yet, to what extent do special education researchers discuss IDEA? In this study, we systematically reviewed every article published in a 10-year time frame in three special education journals (N = 887). Only 23.1% of the articles had explicit implications for IDEA. Most implications were tied to the compliance of IDEA as opposed to how IDEA could be improved. The disconnect between research and law has significant implications for research, policy, and practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:01956744
DOI:10.1086/713825