Using Kane's framework to build a validity argument supporting (or not) virtual OSCEs.
Saved in:
| Title: | Using Kane's framework to build a validity argument supporting (or not) virtual OSCEs. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Hess, Brian J.1, Kvern, Brent1 |
| Source: | Medical Teacher. September 2021, Vol. 43 Issue 9, p999-1004. 6p. |
| Subject Terms: | *COVID-19 pandemic, Research evaluation, Conceptual structures, Electronic publications |
| Abstract: | In the article, the authors discuss the reasons why objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) should be held online using the framework developed by M. T. Kane to collect and interpret evidence supporting the proposed shift. Also cited are the four key inferences in Kane's framework like scoring, generalization, and extrapolation, and how a well-designed virtual OSCE is better than poorly designed in-person OSCE. |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | In the article, the authors discuss the reasons why objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) should be held online using the framework developed by M. T. Kane to collect and interpret evidence supporting the proposed shift. Also cited are the four key inferences in Kane's framework like scoring, generalization, and extrapolation, and how a well-designed virtual OSCE is better than poorly designed in-person OSCE. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0142159X |
| DOI: | 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1910641 |
