Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Effect of audiological testing on programmable ventriculoperitoneal shunts. |
| Authors: |
Abdul-Hamid, Ayeshah1, Zilani, Gulam2, Bryant, Catriona3, Bryant, Alan3, Qureishi, Ali4, Jeyaretna, Sanjeeva2, MacKeith, Samuel4 |
| Source: |
International Journal of Audiology. Feb 2022, Vol. 61 Issue 2, p173-176. 4p. 1 Color Photograph, 1 Graph. |
| Subject Terms: |
Audiology instruments, In vitro studies, Hydrocephalus, Cerebrospinal fluid shunts, Magnetic fields, Temporal bone |
| Abstract: |
This study aimed at measuring the magnetic field strength of commonly used types of audiological testing equipment and determine their effects on the three most commonly used programmable ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts to try and quantify the risk of a VP shunt being reprogrammed during audiological testing. In this in vitro study, magnetic field strength was measured for TDH 39 supra-aural earphones, B71 bone vibrator, ALGO 3i probe, Bio-logic Nav Pro probe, Otodynamics otoport insert earphone and Madsen Zodiac tympanometry probe. Magnetic field strength associated with transducers placed on a model of a skulls having implanted Miethke ProGAV 2.0, Medtronic Strata II and Codman Hakim programmable VP shunts was measured. The supra-aural earphones had a magnetic field strength of 14 mT at 0 mm, which dropped to 0 mT at 10 mm away from the transducer. All other equipment had a magnetic field strength of 3.5 mT or less at 0 mm. There was no instance of reprogramming of the shunts by the transducers. The findings suggest that the risk of inadvertent valve-reprogramming by the transducers is extremely small. However, care should be taken to avoid placing any of the transducers directly over the shunt. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of International Journal of Audiology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Education Research Complete |