EL DEPORTE Y SU CONFIGURACIÓN EN EL PROGRAMA DEPORTES COLECTIVOS II DEL INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE EDUCACIÓN FÍSICA.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: EL DEPORTE Y SU CONFIGURACIÓN EN EL PROGRAMA DEPORTES COLECTIVOS II DEL INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE EDUCACIÓN FÍSICA.
Alternate Title: SPORT AND ITS CONFIGURATION IN THE COLLECTIVE SPORTS II PROGRAMME OF THE HIGHER INSTITUTE OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION.
Authors: Quiroga Galeazzi, Andrea1 aquirogaleazzi@gmail.com
Source: Contextos Educativos. 2022, Issue 29, p73-88. 16p.
Subject Terms: *Physical education, *Communicative competence, *Education theory, History of sports, Practice (Sports), Cultural movements, Cultural production, Sports ethics
Geographic Terms: Uruguay, Brazil
Abstract (English): The article analyzes the program of the curricular unit "Collective Sports II" of the Physical Education degree curriculum at the University of the Republic in Uruguay. The program focuses on the basic initiation of sports such as soccer, handball, basketball, and volleyball, and presents objectives related to the technical, tactical, and regulatory elements of these sports. The analysis is based on a perspective that emphasizes the development of the individual and the teaching of motor actions, and mentions Parlebas' theory as a possible foundation for understanding sports. The program also considers the influence of the environment and roles in sports practice. The text presents a reflection on the perspective of the body in the approach of the Collective Sports II program, based on Pierre Parlebas' theory. It focuses on motor praxiology and motor action as a science of motor action and its results. The importance of psychomotricity in the development of motor behaviors is mentioned. The classification of motor actions and situations and the possibility of categorizing and describing games and sports structurally and functionally are highlighted. The need to understand the conception of the body from which this theory is carried out is raised. The article analyzes the Collective Sports II program of a university and questions the lack of consideration of historical, social, and cultural aspects in sports education. The objectives set in primary, secondary, and technical professional education programs that seek to develop students' autonomy and critical capacity are mentioned. The lack of centrality in knowledge about collective sports is criticized, and the importance of considering bodily practices and the cultural and political construction of the body is highlighted. A physical education program in Brazil that seeks to overcome the reductionist conception of the human being and consider the political dimension of bodily practices is mentioned. In general, it is concluded that the Collective Sports II program does not take these aspects into account in sports education. The text presents a critical perspective on the previous model of physical education and sports, emphasizing the importance of considering the cultural body of movement. The need to re-signify the relationship between physical education and nature and the knowledge generated from it is raised. The question is raised whether students should learn about sports or learn to perform, and three competencies in which physical education works are mentioned: objective, social, and communicative. In addition, the importance of a Curricular Reference for Physical Education in Brazil and Uruguay is mentioned, which seeks to teach students to experience, know, and appreciate different bodily practices as cultural productions. The article discusses the importance of balancing technical and critical knowledge in sports education. It is proposed that students need to experience a variety of bodily practices to access the cultural heritage of humanity. However, the question is raised whether the Collective Sports II program in the Physical Education degree considers these aspects in its approach. The theories of motor praxiology and the Cultural Body of Movement are mentioned as contradictory approaches in sports education. A critical teaching of sports that takes into account its social and cultural dimension is proposed. The article addresses the need to consider the historical, political, and cultural context when teaching sports. The importance of delving into the sports phenomenon and establishing perspectives that go beyond techniques and regulations is highlighted. The lack of themes addressing the ethics, aesthetics, politics, culture, and history of sports in educational programs is criticized. The need to reflect on and debate what sport is presented in these programs is raised. [Extracted from the article]
Abstract (Spanish): El artículo analiza el programa de la unidad curricular Deportes Colectivos II del plan de estudios de la Licenciatura en Educación Física de la Universidad de la República en Uruguay. El programa se enfoca en la iniciación básica de deportes como fútbol, balonmano, baloncesto y voleibol, y presenta objetivos relacionados con los elementos técnicos, tácticos y reglamentarios de estos deportes. El análisis se basa en una perspectiva que enfatiza el desarrollo del sujeto y la enseñanza de acciones motrices, y se menciona la teoría de Parlebas como una posible fundamentación para entender el deporte. El programa también considera la influencia del entorno y los roles en la práctica deportiva. El texto presenta una reflexión sobre la perspectiva del cuerpo en el enfoque del programa de Deportes Colectivos II, basado en la teoría de Pierre Parlebas. Se enfoca en la praxiología motriz y la acción motriz como ciencia de la acción motriz y sus resultados. Se menciona la importancia de la psicomotricidad en el desarrollo de las conductas motrices. Se destaca la clasificación de acciones y situaciones motrices y la posibilidad de categorizar y describir juegos y deportes estructural y funcionalmente. Se plantea la necesidad de comprender la concepción de cuerpo desde la cual se lleva a cabo esta teoría. El artículo analiza el programa de Deportes Colectivos II de una universidad y cuestiona la falta de consideración de aspectos históricos, sociales y culturales en la enseñanza del deporte. Se mencionan los objetivos planteados en programas de educación primaria, secundaria y técnico profesional que buscan desarrollar la autonomía y la capacidad crítica de los estudiantes. Se critica la falta de centralidad en el conocimiento sobre los deportes colectivos y se destaca la importancia de considerar las prácticas corporales y la construcción cultural y política del cuerpo. Se menciona un programa de educación física en Brasil que busca superar la concepción reduccionista del ser humano y considerar la dimensión política de las prácticas corporales. En general, se concluye que el programa de Deportes Colectivos II no tiene en cuenta estos aspectos en la enseñanza del deporte. El texto presenta una perspectiva crítica sobre el modelo anterior de educación física y deporte, enfatizando la importancia de considerar la cultura corporal de movimiento. Se plantea la necesidad de re significar la relación de la educación física con la naturaleza y los conocimientos generados a partir de ella. Se cuestiona si los estudiantes deben aprender sobre el deporte o aprender a rendir, y se mencionan tres competencias en las que trabaja la educación física: objetiva, social y comunicativa. Además, se menciona la importancia de un Referencial Curricular de Educación Física en Brasil y Uruguay, que busca enseñar a los estudiantes a experimentar, conocer y apreciar diferentes prácticas corporales como producciones culturales. El artículo discute la importancia de equilibrar los conocimientos técnicos y críticos en la enseñanza del deporte. Se plantea que es necesario que los estudiantes experimenten una variedad de prácticas corporales para acceder al patrimonio cultural de la humanidad. Sin embargo, se cuestiona si el programa de Deportes Colectivos II en la Licenciatura en Educación Física considera estos aspectos en su enfoque. Se mencionan las teorías de la praxiología motriz y la Cultura Corporal de Movimiento como enfoques contradictorios en la enseñanza del deporte. Se propone una enseñanza crítica del deporte que tome en cuenta su dimensión social y cultural. El artículo aborda la necesidad de considerar el contexto histórico, político y cultural al enseñar deporte. Se destaca la importancia de profundizar en el fenómeno deportivo y establecer miradas que vayan más allá de las técnicas y reglamentos. Se critica la falta de temáticas que aborden la ética, estética, política, cultura e historia del deporte en los programas educativos. Se plantea la necesidad de reflexionar y debatir sobre qué deporte se presenta en [Extracted from the article]
Copyright of Contextos Educativos is the property of Universidad de la Rioja, Servicio de Publicaciones and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:The article analyzes the program of the curricular unit "Collective Sports II" of the Physical Education degree curriculum at the University of the Republic in Uruguay. The program focuses on the basic initiation of sports such as soccer, handball, basketball, and volleyball, and presents objectives related to the technical, tactical, and regulatory elements of these sports. The analysis is based on a perspective that emphasizes the development of the individual and the teaching of motor actions, and mentions Parlebas' theory as a possible foundation for understanding sports. The program also considers the influence of the environment and roles in sports practice. The text presents a reflection on the perspective of the body in the approach of the Collective Sports II program, based on Pierre Parlebas' theory. It focuses on motor praxiology and motor action as a science of motor action and its results. The importance of psychomotricity in the development of motor behaviors is mentioned. The classification of motor actions and situations and the possibility of categorizing and describing games and sports structurally and functionally are highlighted. The need to understand the conception of the body from which this theory is carried out is raised. The article analyzes the Collective Sports II program of a university and questions the lack of consideration of historical, social, and cultural aspects in sports education. The objectives set in primary, secondary, and technical professional education programs that seek to develop students' autonomy and critical capacity are mentioned. The lack of centrality in knowledge about collective sports is criticized, and the importance of considering bodily practices and the cultural and political construction of the body is highlighted. A physical education program in Brazil that seeks to overcome the reductionist conception of the human being and consider the political dimension of bodily practices is mentioned. In general, it is concluded that the Collective Sports II program does not take these aspects into account in sports education. The text presents a critical perspective on the previous model of physical education and sports, emphasizing the importance of considering the cultural body of movement. The need to re-signify the relationship between physical education and nature and the knowledge generated from it is raised. The question is raised whether students should learn about sports or learn to perform, and three competencies in which physical education works are mentioned: objective, social, and communicative. In addition, the importance of a Curricular Reference for Physical Education in Brazil and Uruguay is mentioned, which seeks to teach students to experience, know, and appreciate different bodily practices as cultural productions. The article discusses the importance of balancing technical and critical knowledge in sports education. It is proposed that students need to experience a variety of bodily practices to access the cultural heritage of humanity. However, the question is raised whether the Collective Sports II program in the Physical Education degree considers these aspects in its approach. The theories of motor praxiology and the Cultural Body of Movement are mentioned as contradictory approaches in sports education. A critical teaching of sports that takes into account its social and cultural dimension is proposed. The article addresses the need to consider the historical, political, and cultural context when teaching sports. The importance of delving into the sports phenomenon and establishing perspectives that go beyond techniques and regulations is highlighted. The lack of themes addressing the ethics, aesthetics, politics, culture, and history of sports in educational programs is criticized. The need to reflect on and debate what sport is presented in these programs is raised. [Extracted from the article]
ISSN:1575023X
DOI:10.18172/con.5106