Academic Disciplines in the Context of Library Classification: Mapping University Faculty Structures to the DDC and LCC Schemes.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Academic Disciplines in the Context of Library Classification: Mapping University Faculty Structures to the DDC and LCC Schemes.
Authors: Hider, Philip1, Coe, Mary1
Source: Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. 2022, Vol. 60 Issue 2, p194-213. 20p.
Subject Terms: *Dewey decimal classification, *Library of Congress classification, *College curriculum, *Faculty-college relationship, Bibliographic classification
Abstract: We investigated the extent to which the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) and the Library of Congress Classification reflect the organizational structures of Australian universities. The mapping of the faculty structures of ten universities to the two schemes showed strong alignment, with very few fields represented in the names of the organizational units not covered at all by either bibliographic scheme. This suggests a degree of universality and "scientific and educational consensus" with respect to both the schemes and academic disciplines. The article goes on to discuss the concept of discipline and its application in bibliographic classification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Cataloging & Classification Quarterly is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:We investigated the extent to which the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) and the Library of Congress Classification reflect the organizational structures of Australian universities. The mapping of the faculty structures of ten universities to the two schemes showed strong alignment, with very few fields represented in the names of the organizational units not covered at all by either bibliographic scheme. This suggests a degree of universality and "scientific and educational consensus" with respect to both the schemes and academic disciplines. The article goes on to discuss the concept of discipline and its application in bibliographic classification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:01639374
DOI:10.1080/01639374.2022.2040675