Los resultados de la prueba Saber 11 de Ciencias Sociales y las opiniones de los estudiantes: convergencias y divergencias.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Los resultados de la prueba Saber 11 de Ciencias Sociales y las opiniones de los estudiantes: convergencias y divergencias.
Alternate Title: Results of the Saber 11 Test of Social Sciences and Students Opinions: Convergences and Divergences.
Authors: Palacios Mena, Nancy1 n.palaciosm@uniandes.edu.co, Rodríguez Márquez, Miguel Armando2 marodriguezm@ut.edu.co
Source: Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa. 2019, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p1-18. 18p.
Subject Terms: *Secondary education, *Educational evaluation, *Standardized tests, *Effective teaching, *Educational quality, Social sciences
Geographic Terms: Colombia
Abstract (English): The objective of the article is to analyze, on one hand, the results of the Social Sciences tests of the 2016 State Examination in Colombia and on the other, the students' opinions on the preparation they receive for said test within the framework of the evaluation processes of the subject. For this, a quantitative methodology was used with information from two sources: the Colombian Institute for the Evaluation of Education (ICFES) and a survey. The data was systematized using the Infostad Professional statistical program. It was determined that although these tests describe the achievement of particular levels of performance of students in the area of Social Sciences, it is necessary that these results can help to understand curricular aspects and teaching practices; this implies a shift from asking how much the students know, to asking what they know and what they are capable of doing and focusing the reflection on the pedagogical uses of the results of the exams. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Spanish): El objetivo de este artículo es analizar, por un lado, los resultados de las pruebas de Ciencias Sociales del examen de Estado del año 2016 en Colombia y, por el otro, las opiniones de los estudiantes sobre la preparación que reciben para dicha prueba en el marco de los procesos de evaluación de la asignatura. Se utilizó una metodología cuantitativa con información de dos fuentes: el Instituto Colombiano para la Evaluación de la Educación y una encuesta. Los datos se sistematizaron utilizando el programa estadístico Infostad Profesional. Se determinó que, si bien estas pruebas describen el logro de niveles particulares de desempeño de los estudiantes en el área de Ciencias Sociales, es necesario que estos resultados puedan ayudar a comprender aspectos curriculares y prácticas de enseñanza; esto implica un desplazamiento en la pregunta "cuánto saben los estudiantes" a "qué saben" y "qué son capaces de hacer", y centrar la reflexión en los usos pedagógicos de los resultados de los exámenes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa is the property of Universidad Autonoma de Baja California (UABC) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:The objective of the article is to analyze, on one hand, the results of the Social Sciences tests of the 2016 State Examination in Colombia and on the other, the students' opinions on the preparation they receive for said test within the framework of the evaluation processes of the subject. For this, a quantitative methodology was used with information from two sources: the Colombian Institute for the Evaluation of Education (ICFES) and a survey. The data was systematized using the Infostad Professional statistical program. It was determined that although these tests describe the achievement of particular levels of performance of students in the area of Social Sciences, it is necessary that these results can help to understand curricular aspects and teaching practices; this implies a shift from asking how much the students know, to asking what they know and what they are capable of doing and focusing the reflection on the pedagogical uses of the results of the exams. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:16074041
DOI:10.24320/redie.2019.21.e28.2116