Los resultados de la prueba Saber 11 de Ciencias Sociales y las opiniones de los estudiantes: convergencias y divergencias.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Los resultados de la prueba Saber 11 de Ciencias Sociales y las opiniones de los estudiantes: convergencias y divergencias.
Alternate Title: Results of the Saber 11 Test of Social Sciences and Students Opinions: Convergences and Divergences.
Authors: Palacios Mena, Nancy1 n.palaciosm@uniandes.edu.co, Rodríguez Márquez, Miguel Armando2 marodriguezm@ut.edu.co
Source: Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa. 2019, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p1-18. 18p.
Subject Terms: *Secondary education, *Educational evaluation, *Standardized tests, *Effective teaching, *Educational quality, Social sciences
Geographic Terms: Colombia
Abstract (English): The objective of the article is to analyze, on one hand, the results of the Social Sciences tests of the 2016 State Examination in Colombia and on the other, the students' opinions on the preparation they receive for said test within the framework of the evaluation processes of the subject. For this, a quantitative methodology was used with information from two sources: the Colombian Institute for the Evaluation of Education (ICFES) and a survey. The data was systematized using the Infostad Professional statistical program. It was determined that although these tests describe the achievement of particular levels of performance of students in the area of Social Sciences, it is necessary that these results can help to understand curricular aspects and teaching practices; this implies a shift from asking how much the students know, to asking what they know and what they are capable of doing and focusing the reflection on the pedagogical uses of the results of the exams. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Spanish): El objetivo de este artículo es analizar, por un lado, los resultados de las pruebas de Ciencias Sociales del examen de Estado del año 2016 en Colombia y, por el otro, las opiniones de los estudiantes sobre la preparación que reciben para dicha prueba en el marco de los procesos de evaluación de la asignatura. Se utilizó una metodología cuantitativa con información de dos fuentes: el Instituto Colombiano para la Evaluación de la Educación y una encuesta. Los datos se sistematizaron utilizando el programa estadístico Infostad Profesional. Se determinó que, si bien estas pruebas describen el logro de niveles particulares de desempeño de los estudiantes en el área de Ciencias Sociales, es necesario que estos resultados puedan ayudar a comprender aspectos curriculares y prácticas de enseñanza; esto implica un desplazamiento en la pregunta "cuánto saben los estudiantes" a "qué saben" y "qué son capaces de hacer", y centrar la reflexión en los usos pedagógicos de los resultados de los exámenes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa is the property of Universidad Autonoma de Baja California (UABC) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 159765317
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Los resultados de la prueba Saber 11 de Ciencias Sociales y las opiniones de los estudiantes: convergencias y divergencias.
– Name: TitleAlt
  Label: Alternate Title
  Group: TiAlt
  Data: Results of the Saber 11 Test of Social Sciences and Students Opinions: Convergences and Divergences.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Palacios+Mena%2C+Nancy%22">Palacios Mena, Nancy</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> n.palaciosm@uniandes.edu.co</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rodríguez+Márquez%2C+Miguel+Armando%22">Rodríguez Márquez, Miguel Armando</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><i> marodriguezm@ut.edu.co</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Revista+Electrónica+de+Investigación+Educativa%22">Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa</searchLink>. 2019, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p1-18. 18p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Secondary+education%22">Secondary education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+evaluation%22">Educational evaluation</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Standardized+tests%22">Standardized tests</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Effective+teaching%22">Effective teaching</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+quality%22">Educational quality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+sciences%22">Social sciences</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectGeographic
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Colombia%22">Colombia</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract (English)
  Group: Ab
  Data: The objective of the article is to analyze, on one hand, the results of the Social Sciences tests of the 2016 State Examination in Colombia and on the other, the students' opinions on the preparation they receive for said test within the framework of the evaluation processes of the subject. For this, a quantitative methodology was used with information from two sources: the Colombian Institute for the Evaluation of Education (ICFES) and a survey. The data was systematized using the Infostad Professional statistical program. It was determined that although these tests describe the achievement of particular levels of performance of students in the area of Social Sciences, it is necessary that these results can help to understand curricular aspects and teaching practices; this implies a shift from asking how much the students know, to asking what they know and what they are capable of doing and focusing the reflection on the pedagogical uses of the results of the exams. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract (Spanish)
  Group: Ab
  Data: El objetivo de este artículo es analizar, por un lado, los resultados de las pruebas de Ciencias Sociales del examen de Estado del año 2016 en Colombia y, por el otro, las opiniones de los estudiantes sobre la preparación que reciben para dicha prueba en el marco de los procesos de evaluación de la asignatura. Se utilizó una metodología cuantitativa con información de dos fuentes: el Instituto Colombiano para la Evaluación de la Educación y una encuesta. Los datos se sistematizaron utilizando el programa estadístico Infostad Profesional. Se determinó que, si bien estas pruebas describen el logro de niveles particulares de desempeño de los estudiantes en el área de Ciencias Sociales, es necesario que estos resultados puedan ayudar a comprender aspectos curriculares y prácticas de enseñanza; esto implica un desplazamiento en la pregunta "cuánto saben los estudiantes" a "qué saben" y "qué son capaces de hacer", y centrar la reflexión en los usos pedagógicos de los resultados de los exámenes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa is the property of Universidad Autonoma de Baja California (UABC) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=159765317
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.24320/redie.2019.21.e28.2116
    Languages:
      – Code: spa
        Text: Spanish
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 18
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Secondary education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Standardized tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Effective teaching
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational quality
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social sciences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Colombia
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Los resultados de la prueba Saber 11 de Ciencias Sociales y las opiniones de los estudiantes: convergencias y divergencias.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Palacios Mena, Nancy
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rodríguez Márquez, Miguel Armando
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: 2019
              Type: published
              Y: 2019
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 16074041
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 21
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa
              Type: main
ResultId 1