View in EDS

Blocking blockchain: Examining the social, cultural, and institutional factors causing innovation resistance to digital technology in seafood supply chains.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Blocking blockchain: Examining the social, cultural, and institutional factors causing innovation resistance to digital technology in seafood supply chains.
Authors:	Thompson, Benjamin S.¹ (AUTHOR) benjamin.thompson@monash.edu, Rust, Sascha^2,3 (AUTHOR)
Source:	Technology in Society. May2023, Vol. 73, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Subject Terms:	Digital technology, Supply chains, Blockchains, Seafood, Planned behavior theory, Two-dimensional bar codes, Fraud
Geographic Terms:	Australia
Abstract:	Digital technologies such as blockchain, smart contracts, QR codes, and fintech are forecast to improve the transparency, sustainability, and efficiency of supply-chains in numerous sectors. However, such innovations may face greater resistance and implementation challenges in some sectors more than others. Here, we conduct 24 interviews with fishers, aquaculturists, restaurants, and industry experts around existing blockchain applications seeking to enhance seafood traceability and trackability in Australia. We combine innovation resistance theory, principal-agent theory, and the theory of planned behaviour to reveal how institutional norms and socio-cultural dynamics are deterring blockchain adoption. For example, the seafood industry exhibits limited digitization and automation, and an oligopoly of wholesalers with the power and networks to control the supply chain – against a backdrop of food fraud claims. Results suggest blockchain could threaten the competitive advantage of wholesalers, since it would reverse existing asymmetries around trade, price, and provenance information. Furthermore, despite favouring the decentralisation and information sharing that blockchain provides, other supply chain actors were hesitant to adopt it through fear of jeopardising relationships with these wholesalers upon which their business models rely. We assert that blockchain will only drive transformative change if the most influential supply chain actors see value in using it. • Digital technology uptake and usage can be resisted by some supply chain actors. • This is particularly true for wholesalers in seafood supply chains in Australia. • Wholesalers defend their competitive advantages related to trade and price information. • Digital technology could also expose undesirable behaviours related to food fraud. • Theoretical contributions and practical considerations are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Technology in Society is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Education Research Complete

Description
Abstract:	Digital technologies such as blockchain, smart contracts, QR codes, and fintech are forecast to improve the transparency, sustainability, and efficiency of supply-chains in numerous sectors. However, such innovations may face greater resistance and implementation challenges in some sectors more than others. Here, we conduct 24 interviews with fishers, aquaculturists, restaurants, and industry experts around existing blockchain applications seeking to enhance seafood traceability and trackability in Australia. We combine innovation resistance theory, principal-agent theory, and the theory of planned behaviour to reveal how institutional norms and socio-cultural dynamics are deterring blockchain adoption. For example, the seafood industry exhibits limited digitization and automation, and an oligopoly of wholesalers with the power and networks to control the supply chain – against a backdrop of food fraud claims. Results suggest blockchain could threaten the competitive advantage of wholesalers, since it would reverse existing asymmetries around trade, price, and provenance information. Furthermore, despite favouring the decentralisation and information sharing that blockchain provides, other supply chain actors were hesitant to adopt it through fear of jeopardising relationships with these wholesalers upon which their business models rely. We assert that blockchain will only drive transformative change if the most influential supply chain actors see value in using it. • Digital technology uptake and usage can be resisted by some supply chain actors. • This is particularly true for wholesalers in seafood supply chains in Australia. • Wholesalers defend their competitive advantages related to trade and price information. • Digital technology could also expose undesirable behaviours related to food fraud. • Theoretical contributions and practical considerations are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	0160791X
DOI:	10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102235