Reviewing the literature to clarify self-study research.
Saved in:
| Title: | Reviewing the literature to clarify self-study research. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | McCool, Meredith1 mmccool@mcpsva.org, Myers, Joy2 |
| Source: | Educational Action Research. Jul2023, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p472-489. 18p. 1 Diagram, 2 Charts. |
| Subject Terms: | *Autodidacticism, *Action research, *Teacher education, *Professional education |
| Abstract: | This article reports on an integrative literature review of the self-study research published between 2009 and 2021 and examines how authors defined, enacted, and addressed validity within the self-study literature. We follow the example provided in the 2004 article by Feldman, Paugh, and Mills in order to gain more insights into the distinctions between self-study and action research by comparing and contrasting these 'parallel' modes of research. In addition, we constructed a visual representation to highlight the overlap between the featured methodologies in this review. Implications specific to the parallel approaches of self-study and action research are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Educational Action Research is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | This article reports on an integrative literature review of the self-study research published between 2009 and 2021 and examines how authors defined, enacted, and addressed validity within the self-study literature. We follow the example provided in the 2004 article by Feldman, Paugh, and Mills in order to gain more insights into the distinctions between self-study and action research by comparing and contrasting these 'parallel' modes of research. In addition, we constructed a visual representation to highlight the overlap between the featured methodologies in this review. Implications specific to the parallel approaches of self-study and action research are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 09650792 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/09650792.2021.1976660 |
