Socialización y pedagogización.
Saved in:
| Title: | Socialización y pedagogización. |
|---|---|
| Alternate Title: | Socialization and Pedagogization. Socialização e pedagogização. |
| Authors: | Díaz Villa, Mario1 mdiazvilla@gmail.com, de Jesús Carrillo Hernández, Maria Teresa2 teresa.carrillo@hotmail.com |
| Source: | Pedagogía y Saberes. jul-dic2023, Issue 59, p43-55. 13p. |
| Subject Terms: | Social change, Twenty-first century, Sociology, Constitutions, Character, Modal logic |
| Abstract (English): | In both the field of sociology and in pedagogy, the nuclear concepts of this paper are linked to the constitution of identities, which differ in terms of the historical change in the social basis. Thus, while the concept of socialization represented the ordering of behavior, character, manners, and forms of relation, which responded to modern rationality; pedagogization represents the decentering of hierarchical forms of socialization, mediated by rigid limits, and the emergence of subtle, imperceptible, diffuse and apparently empty modes of control modalities. However, these concepts coexist and hybridize in the 21st century. These two concepts are described and analyzed in this paper, in which some relevant aspects are developed to understand the difference between socialization and pedagogization, and to clarify the historical role of both concepts in the constitution of identity and, contemporarily, in the domestication and control of mind. For analytical purposes, first, we will refer to the concept of socialization; secondly, we will address pedagogization. Finally, we propose some issues to read critically the value systems and the constellation of imaginaries built by pedagogization, which feeds flexible, transitive, hedonistic, healthy lifestyles, through which the subject is co-opted and decentered. Therefore, the paper is the result of the theoretical research process carried out by the authors on the relations between pedagogy and culture, relations that have crossed the social formations throughout history. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Spanish): | Tanto en el campo de la sociología como en el de la pedagogía, los conceptos nucleares de este artículo están vinculados a la constitución de identidades, que se diferencian en términos del cambio histórico en las bases sociales. Así, mientras el concepto de socialización representaba el ordenamiento de la conducta, el carácter, las maneras y formas de relación, que respondían a la racionalidad moderna, la pedagogización representa el descentramiento de las formas de socialización jerarquizadas, mediadas por límites rígidos, y el surgimiento de modalidades de control sutiles, imperceptibles, difusas y aparentemente vacías. Sin embargo, estos conceptos coexisten y se hibridan en el siglo xxi. Ellos son objeto de descripción y análisis en el presente artículo, en el cual se desarrollan algunos aspectos relevantes para comprender su diferencia y esclarecer su papel histórico en la constitución de la identidad y, contemporáneamente, en la domesticación y control del pensamiento. Para efectos analíticos, en primer lugar, nos referiremos al concepto de socialización; en segundo lugar, abordaremos el de pedagogización. Finalmente, planteamos algunas consideraciones para leer críticamente los sistemas de valores y la constelación de imaginarios construidos por la pedagogización, que alimenta estilos de vida flexibles, transitivos, hedonistas, saludables, a través de los cuales el sujeto es sujetado, cooptado y descentrado. El artículo es el resultado del proceso de reflexión teórica que adelantan los autores sobre la relación entre pedagogía y cultura, conceptos interdependientes que han atravesado las diversas formaciones sociales a lo largo de la historia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Portuguese): | Tanto no campo da sociologia quanto no da pedagogia, os conceitos nucleares desde artigo estão ligados à constituição de identidades, que se diferenciam pela mudança histórica das bases sociais. Assim, enquanto o conceito de socialização representava o ordenamento de comportamentos, caráter, maneiras e formas de relacionamento que respondiam à racionalidade moderna; a pedagogização representa o descentramento das formas hierárquicas de socialização, mediadas por limites rígidos e a emergência de formas sutis, impercetíveis, modalidades difusas e aparentemente vazias de controle. No entanto, esses conceitos coexistem e se hibridizam no século xxi. Estes são objeto da descrição e análise durante este artigo, onde são desenvolvidos alguns aspectos relevantes para entender sua diferença e esclarecer seu papel histórico na constituição das identidades e, contemporaneamente, na domesticação e controle do pensamento. Para fins analíticos, primeiramente, nos referiremos ao conceito de socialização; em segundo lugar, abordaremos o da pedagogização. Por fim, propomos algumas considerações para ler criticamente os sistemas de valores e a constelação de imaginários construídos pela pedagogização, que alimenta estilos de vida flexíveis, transitivos, hedonistas, saudáveis, através dos quais o sujeito e submetido, cooptado, descentrado. Portanto, o artigo é resultado do processo de pesquisa teórica realizado pelos autores sobre a relação entre pedagogia e cultura, conceitos interdependentes que atravessam as mais diversas formações sociais ao logo da história. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Pedagogía y Saberes is the property of Universidad Pedaggica Nacional and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| Abstract: | In both the field of sociology and in pedagogy, the nuclear concepts of this paper are linked to the constitution of identities, which differ in terms of the historical change in the social basis. Thus, while the concept of socialization represented the ordering of behavior, character, manners, and forms of relation, which responded to modern rationality; pedagogization represents the decentering of hierarchical forms of socialization, mediated by rigid limits, and the emergence of subtle, imperceptible, diffuse and apparently empty modes of control modalities. However, these concepts coexist and hybridize in the 21st century. These two concepts are described and analyzed in this paper, in which some relevant aspects are developed to understand the difference between socialization and pedagogization, and to clarify the historical role of both concepts in the constitution of identity and, contemporarily, in the domestication and control of mind. For analytical purposes, first, we will refer to the concept of socialization; secondly, we will address pedagogization. Finally, we propose some issues to read critically the value systems and the constellation of imaginaries built by pedagogization, which feeds flexible, transitive, hedonistic, healthy lifestyles, through which the subject is co-opted and decentered. Therefore, the paper is the result of the theoretical research process carried out by the authors on the relations between pedagogy and culture, relations that have crossed the social formations throughout history. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 01212494 |
| DOI: | 10.17227/pys.num59-17972 |
