Understanding the micro‐foundations of administrative corruption in the public sector: Findings from a systematic literature review.
Saved in:
| Title: | Understanding the micro‐foundations of administrative corruption in the public sector: Findings from a systematic literature review. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Weißmüller, Kristina S.1,2 (AUTHOR) k.s.weissmueller@vu.nl, Zuber, Anna2 (AUTHOR) anna.zuber@nek-cne.admin.ch |
| Source: | Public Administration Review. Nov2023, Vol. 83 Issue 6, p1704-1726. 23p. |
| Subject Terms: | Political corruption, Integrity, Public sector, Planned behavior theory, Social processes, Social perception |
| Abstract: | Public sector corruption is one of the most pressing unresolved issues of our time. Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior, this study examines the psychological and contextual mechanisms that allow individuals to rationalize their engagement in administrative corruption. By conducting a systematic literature review of 93 studies, 241 cases of empirical evidence on the relationships between micro, meso, and macro‐level factors are synthesized to reveal seven dimensions, which affect civil servants' corruptibility. Mapping the status quo of the discourse, this study reveals that moral justification for administrative corruption is the outcome of a multi‐layered and dynamic process of social cognition based on various processes of rationalization beyond greed: accountability conflicts, social obligations, and culturally reinforced norms (mis‐)guide behavior in the context of socially varying psychological reference points of accountability and legitimacy that lead to essential value conflicts between self‐serving behavior and integrity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Public Administration Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Public sector corruption is one of the most pressing unresolved issues of our time. Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior, this study examines the psychological and contextual mechanisms that allow individuals to rationalize their engagement in administrative corruption. By conducting a systematic literature review of 93 studies, 241 cases of empirical evidence on the relationships between micro, meso, and macro‐level factors are synthesized to reveal seven dimensions, which affect civil servants' corruptibility. Mapping the status quo of the discourse, this study reveals that moral justification for administrative corruption is the outcome of a multi‐layered and dynamic process of social cognition based on various processes of rationalization beyond greed: accountability conflicts, social obligations, and culturally reinforced norms (mis‐)guide behavior in the context of socially varying psychological reference points of accountability and legitimacy that lead to essential value conflicts between self‐serving behavior and integrity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00333352 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/puar.13699 |
