WORKING GROUP REPORT: CONCEPTIONS AND CONSEQUENCES OF WHAT WE CALL ARGUMENTATION, JUSTIFICATION, AND PROOF.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	WORKING GROUP REPORT: CONCEPTIONS AND CONSEQUENCES OF WHAT WE CALL ARGUMENTATION, JUSTIFICATION, AND PROOF.
Authors:	Conner, AnnaMarie¹ aconner@uga.edu, Staples, Megan² megan.staples@uconn.edu, Cirillo, Michelle³ mcirillo@udel.edu, Kosko, Karl W.⁴ kkosko1@kent.edu, Bieda, Kristen⁵ kbieda@msu.edu
Source:	Conference Papers -- Psychology of Mathematics & Education of North America. 2023, p682-688. 7p.
Subject Terms:	Educational psychology, Mathematics education, Student engagement, Research methodology, *Reasoning
Abstract:	The Conceptions and Consequences of What We Call Argumentation, Justification, and Proof working group met in 2022 to focus on frameworks for studying argumentation, justification, and proof. Working group participants engaged in conversations interrogating past uses of frameworks and considered potential directions for making progress on both new and longstanding questions involving argumentation, justification, and proof. Discussions revolved around the following topics: the teacher's role in joint sensemaking, student agency, defining validity in proof and proving, the role of emerging technologies, and research and practice related to different audiences and argumentation, justification, and proof. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Conference Papers -- Psychology of Mathematics & Education of North America is the property of Psychology of Mathematics & Education of North America and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Education Research Complete

Description
Abstract:	The Conceptions and Consequences of What We Call Argumentation, Justification, and Proof working group met in 2022 to focus on frameworks for studying argumentation, justification, and proof. Working group participants engaged in conversations interrogating past uses of frameworks and considered potential directions for making progress on both new and longstanding questions involving argumentation, justification, and proof. Discussions revolved around the following topics: the teacher's role in joint sensemaking, student agency, defining validity in proof and proving, the role of emerging technologies, and research and practice related to different audiences and argumentation, justification, and proof. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]