LA REVISIÓN POR PARES EXPERTOS: Calidad, colegialidad y ética en las prácticas académicas.
Saved in:
| Title: | LA REVISIÓN POR PARES EXPERTOS: Calidad, colegialidad y ética en las prácticas académicas. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | DUSSEL, INÉS1 idussel@gmail.com, ACEVEDO RODRIGO, ARIADNA2 aacevedo@cinvestav.mx |
| Source: | Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa. ene-mar2024, Vol. 29 Issue 100, p117-133. 17p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Scholarly peer review, *Professional peer review, *Scholarly publishing, *Research bias, *Education research, Mentoring, Check fraud, Coworker relationships, Argument, Ethics |
| Abstract (English): | The article titled "EXPERT PEER REVIEW: Quality, collegiality, and ethics in academic practices" analyzes the importance and changes in peer review in academic production. Current debates on this practice are discussed, as well as changes in academic publishing rules, such as Nature's proposal to publish peer reviewers' reports alongside articles. The guidelines and evaluation formats of various journals are also analyzed, and alternative proposals are put forward to improve the peer review system. The importance of considering the academic and scientific quality of the argument, as well as the relevance and pertinence of the article in the current debate field, is emphasized. Additionally, it is suggested to include evaluation criteria that promote renewal, theoretical and methodological experimentation, and interdisciplinary dialogue. The need to implement mentoring and support methods to address inequalities in academic knowledge production is recognized, and an invitation is extended to keep the door open in peer review and journal editing. [Extracted from the article] |
| Abstract (Spanish): | El artículo titulado "LA REVISIÓN POR PARES EXPERTOS: Calidad, colegialidad y ética en las prácticas académicas" analiza la importancia y los cambios en la revisión por pares en la producción académica. Se discuten los debates actuales sobre esta práctica y se destacan los cambios en las reglas de publicación académica, como la propuesta de Nature de publicar los informes de los pares revisores junto con los artículos. También se analizan las orientaciones y formatos de evaluación de varias revistas y se plantean propuestas alternativas para mejorar el sistema de revisión por pares. Se destaca la importancia de considerar la calidad académica y científica del argumento, así como la relevancia y pertinencia del artículo en el campo de debate actual. Además, se sugiere incluir criterios de evaluación que fomenten la renovación, la experimentación teórica y metodológica, y el diálogo interdisciplinario. Se reconoce la necesidad de implementar formas de tutoría y acompañamiento para atender las desigualdades en la producción del conocimiento académico y se invita a mantener la puerta abierta en la revisión por pares y la edición de revistas. [Extracted from the article] |
| Copyright of Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa is the property of Consejo Mexicano de Investigacion Educativa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 175268472 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: LA REVISIÓN POR PARES EXPERTOS: Calidad, colegialidad y ética en las prácticas académicas. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22DUSSEL%2C+INÉS%22">DUSSEL, INÉS</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> idussel@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22ACEVEDO+RODRIGO%2C+ARIADNA%22">ACEVEDO RODRIGO, ARIADNA</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><i> aacevedo@cinvestav.mx</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Revista+Mexicana+de+Investigación+Educativa%22">Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa</searchLink>. ene-mar2024, Vol. 29 Issue 100, p117-133. 17p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scholarly+peer+review%22">Scholarly peer review</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+peer+review%22">Professional peer review</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scholarly+publishing%22">Scholarly publishing</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+bias%22">Research bias</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Education+research%22">Education research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mentoring%22">Mentoring</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Check+fraud%22">Check fraud</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Coworker+relationships%22">Coworker relationships</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Argument%22">Argument</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract (English) Group: Ab Data: The article titled "EXPERT PEER REVIEW: Quality, collegiality, and ethics in academic practices" analyzes the importance and changes in peer review in academic production. Current debates on this practice are discussed, as well as changes in academic publishing rules, such as Nature's proposal to publish peer reviewers' reports alongside articles. The guidelines and evaluation formats of various journals are also analyzed, and alternative proposals are put forward to improve the peer review system. The importance of considering the academic and scientific quality of the argument, as well as the relevance and pertinence of the article in the current debate field, is emphasized. Additionally, it is suggested to include evaluation criteria that promote renewal, theoretical and methodological experimentation, and interdisciplinary dialogue. The need to implement mentoring and support methods to address inequalities in academic knowledge production is recognized, and an invitation is extended to keep the door open in peer review and journal editing. [Extracted from the article] – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract (Spanish) Group: Ab Data: El artículo titulado "LA REVISIÓN POR PARES EXPERTOS: Calidad, colegialidad y ética en las prácticas académicas" analiza la importancia y los cambios en la revisión por pares en la producción académica. Se discuten los debates actuales sobre esta práctica y se destacan los cambios en las reglas de publicación académica, como la propuesta de Nature de publicar los informes de los pares revisores junto con los artículos. También se analizan las orientaciones y formatos de evaluación de varias revistas y se plantean propuestas alternativas para mejorar el sistema de revisión por pares. Se destaca la importancia de considerar la calidad académica y científica del argumento, así como la relevancia y pertinencia del artículo en el campo de debate actual. Además, se sugiere incluir criterios de evaluación que fomenten la renovación, la experimentación teórica y metodológica, y el diálogo interdisciplinario. Se reconoce la necesidad de implementar formas de tutoría y acompañamiento para atender las desigualdades en la producción del conocimiento académico y se invita a mantener la puerta abierta en la revisión por pares y la edición de revistas. [Extracted from the article] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa is the property of Consejo Mexicano de Investigacion Educativa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=175268472 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Code: spa Text: Spanish PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 17 StartPage: 117 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Scholarly peer review Type: general – SubjectFull: Professional peer review Type: general – SubjectFull: Scholarly publishing Type: general – SubjectFull: Research bias Type: general – SubjectFull: Education research Type: general – SubjectFull: Mentoring Type: general – SubjectFull: Check fraud Type: general – SubjectFull: Coworker relationships Type: general – SubjectFull: Argument Type: general – SubjectFull: Ethics Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: LA REVISIÓN POR PARES EXPERTOS: Calidad, colegialidad y ética en las prácticas académicas. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: DUSSEL, INÉS – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: ACEVEDO RODRIGO, ARIADNA IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Text: ene-mar2024 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 14056666 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 29 – Type: issue Value: 100 Titles: – TitleFull: Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
