Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Estructura Factorial, Validez, Fiabilidad e Invariancia de Género del Cuestionario de Autoevaluación de Ansiedad ante los Exámenes (CAAE). |
| Alternate Title: |
Factor Structure, Validity, Reliability and Gender Invariance of the Self-Assessment Questionnaire for Exams-related Anxiety (CAAE). |
| Authors: |
MALAS, OLGA1 malas.tolsa@outlook.es |
| Source: |
Estudios Sobre Educacion. Feb2024, Issue 46, p79-98. 20p. |
| Subject Terms: |
*Anxiety, *Factor structure, *Self-evaluation, *College students, *Cognition, Structural equation modeling, Confirmatory factor analysis, Gender nonconformity |
| Geographic Terms: |
Spain |
| Abstract (English): |
The aims of this study was to validate the Self-Assessment Questionnaire for Exams-related Anxiety (CAAE, for its acronym in Spanish) in university students (n= 1024) of both sexes (66.4% women, and 33,6% men) and 20.34 years of mean age (SD: 1.78). For the study, the sample was randomly divided into two groups. With first subgroup 23 different structures were tested applying an approach based on Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM). The Bifactorial S-1 model, with a general factor and a specific cognitive factor, presented the best fit indices (TLI: 0,91; CFI: 0,93; RM-SEA: 0,077). The model was replicated in the second sample. Its validity, reliability and gender invariance were confirmed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Spanish): |
El objetivo de este estudio fue validar el Cuestionario de Autoevaluación de la Ansiedad ante los Exámenes (CAAE) en estudiantes universitarios (n= 1024), de ambos sexos (66,4% mujeres y 33,6% hombres) y 20,34 años de edad media (DE: 1,78). Para el estudio, la muestra se dividió aleatoriamente en dos grupos. Con el primer grupo se probaron 23 modelos estructurales utilizando un enfoque basado en el análisis factorial confirmatorio (CFA, por sus siglas en inglés) y el análisis exploratorio de modelos estructurales (ESEM, por sus siglas en inglés). El modelo Bifactorial S-1, con un factor general y un factor cognitivo específico, presentó los mejores índices de ajuste (TLI: 0,91; CFI: 0,93; RMSEA: 0,077). El modelo fue replicado en la segunda muestra confirmándose su validez, fiabilidad e invarianza de género. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Estudios Sobre Educacion is the property of Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, S.A. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Education Research Complete |
