High Achievement in Mathematics and Science among Students in Ireland: An In-Depth Analysis of International Large-Scale Assessment Data Since 2000.
Saved in:
| Title: | High Achievement in Mathematics and Science among Students in Ireland: An In-Depth Analysis of International Large-Scale Assessment Data Since 2000. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Pitsia, Vasiliki1,2,3 pitsiavasiliki@gmail.com, Lysaght, Zita4, O'Leary, Michael1, Shiel, Gerry3 |
| Source: | Irish Educational Studies. Jun2024, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p207-236. 30p. |
| Subject Terms: | *STEM education, *Student engagement, *Academic achievement |
| Geographic Terms: | Ireland |
| Company/Entity: | Progress in International Reading Literacy Study , Programme for International Student Assessment |
| Abstract: | National policy initiatives in Ireland, such as Project Maths and the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education Policy Statement have sought to increase the engagement and performance of students in mathematics and science. The current study investigated the performance of students in Ireland in these areas and in reading in international large-scale assessments (Programme for International Student Assessment [PISA], Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study [TIMSS], and Progress in International Reading Literacy Study [PIRLS]), with a view to better understand the performance of high-achieving students, relative to their counterparts in other countries in general, and in countries with similar average performance. Lower than expected proportions of high achievers were noted and a pattern of relative underachievement was observed among high achievers – those performing at the highest levels of proficiency, and those performing at key benchmarks, including the 75th and 90th percentiles – in mathematics and science to a greater extent than in reading. These issues were found to be consistent over time, and more prevalent at post-primary level, compared with primary level. The findings of this study are discussed with reference to individual and societal costs, and specific issues that need to be investigated further are identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Irish Educational Studies is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | National policy initiatives in Ireland, such as Project Maths and the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education Policy Statement have sought to increase the engagement and performance of students in mathematics and science. The current study investigated the performance of students in Ireland in these areas and in reading in international large-scale assessments (Programme for International Student Assessment [PISA], Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study [TIMSS], and Progress in International Reading Literacy Study [PIRLS]), with a view to better understand the performance of high-achieving students, relative to their counterparts in other countries in general, and in countries with similar average performance. Lower than expected proportions of high achievers were noted and a pattern of relative underachievement was observed among high achievers – those performing at the highest levels of proficiency, and those performing at key benchmarks, including the 75th and 90th percentiles – in mathematics and science to a greater extent than in reading. These issues were found to be consistent over time, and more prevalent at post-primary level, compared with primary level. The findings of this study are discussed with reference to individual and societal costs, and specific issues that need to be investigated further are identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 03323315 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/03323315.2022.2061563 |
