Allow Me to Explain: Benefits of Explaining Extend to Distal Academic Performance.
Saved in:
| Title: | Allow Me to Explain: Benefits of Explaining Extend to Distal Academic Performance. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Modrek, Anahid S.1 (AUTHOR) anahid.modrek@csusb.edu, Lombrozo, Tania2 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Cognitive Science. Sep2024, Vol. 48 Issue 9, p1-18. 18p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Academic achievement, *Cognitive science, *Test scoring, *Metacognition, *Teachers, *Standardized tests |
| Abstract: | How does the act of explaining influence learning? Prior work has studied effects of explaining through a predominantly proximal lens, measuring short‐term outcomes or manipulations within lab settings. Here, we ask whether the benefits of explaining extend to academic performance over time. Specifically, does the quality and frequency of student explanations predict students' later performance on standardized tests of math and English? In Study 1 (N = 127 5th−6th graders), participants completed a causal learning activity during which their explanation quality was evaluated. Controlling for prior test scores, explanation quality directly predicted both math and English standardized test scores the following year. In Study 2 (N = 20,384 10th graders), participants reported aspects of teachers' explanations and their own. Controlling for prior test scores, students' own explanations predicted both math and English state standardized test scores, and teacher explanations were linked to test performance through students' own explanations. Taken together, these findings suggest that benefits of explaining may result in part from the development of a metacognitive explanatory skill that transfers across domains and over time. Implications for cognitive science, pedagogy, and education are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Cognitive Science is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | How does the act of explaining influence learning? Prior work has studied effects of explaining through a predominantly proximal lens, measuring short‐term outcomes or manipulations within lab settings. Here, we ask whether the benefits of explaining extend to academic performance over time. Specifically, does the quality and frequency of student explanations predict students' later performance on standardized tests of math and English? In Study 1 (N = 127 5th−6th graders), participants completed a causal learning activity during which their explanation quality was evaluated. Controlling for prior test scores, explanation quality directly predicted both math and English standardized test scores the following year. In Study 2 (N = 20,384 10th graders), participants reported aspects of teachers' explanations and their own. Controlling for prior test scores, students' own explanations predicted both math and English state standardized test scores, and teacher explanations were linked to test performance through students' own explanations. Taken together, these findings suggest that benefits of explaining may result in part from the development of a metacognitive explanatory skill that transfers across domains and over time. Implications for cognitive science, pedagogy, and education are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 03640213 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/cogs.13496 |
