View in EDS

The implementation of design methodologies for supporting shared decision making in healthcare services: A systematic review.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The implementation of design methodologies for supporting shared decision making in healthcare services: A systematic review.
Authors: Sañudo, Yeray1,2 (AUTHOR), Akoglu, Canan3 (AUTHOR), Rietjens, Judith A.C.4,5 (AUTHOR), Snelders, Dirk5 (AUTHOR), Stiggelbout, Anne M.6,7 (AUTHOR), Sierra-Pérez, Jorge1,2 (AUTHOR) jsierra@unizar.es
Source: Patient Education & Counseling. Feb2025, Vol. 131, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Subject Terms: Patient experience, Patient participation, Grey literature, Patients' attitudes, Medical personnel
Abstract: This systematic review examines how design methodologies support Shared Decision Making (SDM), identifies the most suitable for future use, explores types of methodologies used, challenges faced, and the impact on patients, clinicians, and care pathways. Studies were searched on Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and grey literature (Google Scholar, CORDIS) up to July 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. were analysed to identify patient involvement, design strategies, SDM solutions, and their impact on care paths, professionals, and patients. Out of 2499 studies and 39 grey literature projects identified, 22 studies (reported in 35 publications) were selected, primarily from the USA and Europe (2015 onward). User-Centered Design predominated, involving health professionals more than patients. IPDAS standards were common. Evaluations showed improved patient experience and SDM role, with a potential increase in healthcare professionals' workload. Although design methodologies are used in SDM implementation, improvement is needed. Service Design can enhance implementation by analysing the entire SDM process, while co-creative approaches develop patient-focused solutions that integrate smoothly into health professionals' workflows. Introducing SDM in healthcare is complex, but design methodologies can help by analysing stakeholder needs, providing a broader care path view, and facilitating SDM implementation. • Patients and caregivers should be involved during the whole SDM design process. • Clinicians' workflows must be considered to support and adopt SDM processes. • SDM should be analysed and introduced as a whole process and not as moments. • SD and UCD can support SDM implementation considering stakeholders needs. • SD could help to introduce SDM as a process during the entire care path. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Patient Education & Counseling is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:This systematic review examines how design methodologies support Shared Decision Making (SDM), identifies the most suitable for future use, explores types of methodologies used, challenges faced, and the impact on patients, clinicians, and care pathways. Studies were searched on Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and grey literature (Google Scholar, CORDIS) up to July 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. were analysed to identify patient involvement, design strategies, SDM solutions, and their impact on care paths, professionals, and patients. Out of 2499 studies and 39 grey literature projects identified, 22 studies (reported in 35 publications) were selected, primarily from the USA and Europe (2015 onward). User-Centered Design predominated, involving health professionals more than patients. IPDAS standards were common. Evaluations showed improved patient experience and SDM role, with a potential increase in healthcare professionals' workload. Although design methodologies are used in SDM implementation, improvement is needed. Service Design can enhance implementation by analysing the entire SDM process, while co-creative approaches develop patient-focused solutions that integrate smoothly into health professionals' workflows. Introducing SDM in healthcare is complex, but design methodologies can help by analysing stakeholder needs, providing a broader care path view, and facilitating SDM implementation. • Patients and caregivers should be involved during the whole SDM design process. • Clinicians' workflows must be considered to support and adopt SDM processes. • SDM should be analysed and introduced as a whole process and not as moments. • SD and UCD can support SDM implementation considering stakeholders needs. • SD could help to introduce SDM as a process during the entire care path. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:07383991
DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108551