Direct and Indirect Acts of Labeling Gifted Pupils in the Pro-labeling Pedagogical Situations.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Direct and Indirect Acts of Labeling Gifted Pupils in the Pro-labeling Pedagogical Situations.
Authors:	Klimecká, Eva¹ klimecka@utb.cz
Source:	International Journal of Instruction. Jan2025, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p415-436. 22p.
Subject Terms:	Teacher attitudes, Labeling theory, Qualitative research, Elementary schools, *Teachers
Abstract:	The labeling gifted pupils is related to the unsparing treatment of the label "gifted" which creates inappropriate teachers' emotions and attitudes towards giftedness. Labeling should be given through "direct acts", which include specific pro-labelled actions and speech toward gifted and can be easily identified and eliminated. However, also the "indirect acts" exist, which are hidden in educational procedures. The study aimed to identify the pro-labeling pedagogical situations and describe the direct and indirect acts of labeling. The qualitative research was conducted in elementary schools in the Czech Republic, with class observations and teacher interviews as data sources. Nine pro-labeling pedagogical situations were identified which were typical with signs such as overemphasizing the differences between gifted pupils, unavailability of activities for other pupils, accentuated selection, and rigidity. The direct acts of labelling included naming gifted pupils by specific names, explicitly expressed instructions for gifted pupils, and presenting increased expectations for their performance. Acts of indirect labeling occurred in situations where the primary purpose was to engage gifted pupil, assemble a group of pupils with a strong performer, quickly activate pupils in competitions, develop the pro-social skills of the gifted, help weaker pupils, assign extra tasks according to recommendations and assess specific tasks for the gifted. The study highlights the existence of indirect acts of labelling next to the direct acts. Limiting the theory of labeling only to direct acts can lead to legitimization and frequent use of inappropriate pro-labeling pedagogical situations against gifted pupils. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of International Journal of Instruction is the property of International Journal of Instruction and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Education Research Complete

Description
Abstract:	The labeling gifted pupils is related to the unsparing treatment of the label "gifted" which creates inappropriate teachers' emotions and attitudes towards giftedness. Labeling should be given through "direct acts", which include specific pro-labelled actions and speech toward gifted and can be easily identified and eliminated. However, also the "indirect acts" exist, which are hidden in educational procedures. The study aimed to identify the pro-labeling pedagogical situations and describe the direct and indirect acts of labeling. The qualitative research was conducted in elementary schools in the Czech Republic, with class observations and teacher interviews as data sources. Nine pro-labeling pedagogical situations were identified which were typical with signs such as overemphasizing the differences between gifted pupils, unavailability of activities for other pupils, accentuated selection, and rigidity. The direct acts of labelling included naming gifted pupils by specific names, explicitly expressed instructions for gifted pupils, and presenting increased expectations for their performance. Acts of indirect labeling occurred in situations where the primary purpose was to engage gifted pupil, assemble a group of pupils with a strong performer, quickly activate pupils in competitions, develop the pro-social skills of the gifted, help weaker pupils, assign extra tasks according to recommendations and assess specific tasks for the gifted. The study highlights the existence of indirect acts of labelling next to the direct acts. Limiting the theory of labeling only to direct acts can lead to legitimization and frequent use of inappropriate pro-labeling pedagogical situations against gifted pupils. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	1694609X
DOI:	10.29333/iji.2025.18123a