View in EDS

College algebra students' perceptions of exam errors and the problem-solving process.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: College algebra students' perceptions of exam errors and the problem-solving process.
Authors: Pilgrim, Mary E.1 (AUTHOR), Burks, Linda C.2 (AUTHOR) lburks@scu.edu, Ryals, Megan3 (AUTHOR), Hill-Lindsay, Sloan1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Frontiers in Education. 2025, p1-16. 16p.
Subject Terms: *Problem solving, *Metacognition, *Psychology of students, *Learning strategies, *STEM education, *Algebra, Error analysis in mathematics
Abstract: The first 2 years of college mathematics play a key role in retaining STEM majors. This becomes considerably difficult when students lack the background knowledge needed to begin in Calculus and instead take College Algebra or Precalculus as a first mathematics course. Given the poor success rates often attributed to these courses, researchers have been looking for ways in which to better support student learning, such as examining the impact of enhancing study habits and skills and metacognitive knowledge. One way that students can enhance their metacognitive knowledge in order to modify their study habits and practices is through reflection on mistakes. For this paper in particular, we focus on mistakes students make on exams. We interviewed students after they took an exam and completed an exam analysis worksheet. As part of a study on the impact of metacognitive instruction for College Algebra students we found that students often attributed their exam errors to "simple mistakes." However, we identified many of these errors as "not simple." To understand students' perceptions of their mistakes within the context of problem-solving, we adapted an established problem-solving framework as an analytical tool. We found that students' and researchers' classifications of errors were not aligned across the problem-solving phases. In this paper we present findings from this work, sharing the adapted problem-solving framework, students' perceptions of their exam mistakes, and the relationship between students' categorizations of their errors and the problem-solving phase in which the errors occurred. Understanding students' perceptions of their mistakes helps us better understand how we might support them as learners and better situate them for success in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Frontiers in Education is the property of Frontiers Media S.A. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:The first 2 years of college mathematics play a key role in retaining STEM majors. This becomes considerably difficult when students lack the background knowledge needed to begin in Calculus and instead take College Algebra or Precalculus as a first mathematics course. Given the poor success rates often attributed to these courses, researchers have been looking for ways in which to better support student learning, such as examining the impact of enhancing study habits and skills and metacognitive knowledge. One way that students can enhance their metacognitive knowledge in order to modify their study habits and practices is through reflection on mistakes. For this paper in particular, we focus on mistakes students make on exams. We interviewed students after they took an exam and completed an exam analysis worksheet. As part of a study on the impact of metacognitive instruction for College Algebra students we found that students often attributed their exam errors to "simple mistakes." However, we identified many of these errors as "not simple." To understand students' perceptions of their mistakes within the context of problem-solving, we adapted an established problem-solving framework as an analytical tool. We found that students' and researchers' classifications of errors were not aligned across the problem-solving phases. In this paper we present findings from this work, sharing the adapted problem-solving framework, students' perceptions of their exam mistakes, and the relationship between students' categorizations of their errors and the problem-solving phase in which the errors occurred. Understanding students' perceptions of their mistakes helps us better understand how we might support them as learners and better situate them for success in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:2504284X
DOI:10.3389/feduc.2025.1359713