Can Reading Aloud Replace Teacher Feedback? A Comparative Analysis of Proofreading in ESL Writing.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Can Reading Aloud Replace Teacher Feedback? A Comparative Analysis of Proofreading in ESL Writing.
Authors:	Eckstein, Grant¹ grant_eckstein@byu.edu, Michelle Lung, Ying Suet¹ ysmichelle.lung@gmail.com, Gillette, Natasha² Natasha.Gillette@byuh.edu
Source:	TESL-EJ. Feb2025, Vol. 28 Issue 4, p1-23. 23p.
Subject Terms:	Oral reading, Reading, *Students, Proofreading, Error correction (Information theory)
Abstract:	Students are often encouraged to proofread their writing by reading it aloud. Presumably, this will allow writers to correct local errors. Yet even though this strategy may be effective for native speakers, there is little empirical evidence of its benefit among second language writers. Therefore, we wondered how many errors second language students could correct through reading aloud and how that compared when receiving teacher feedback. In this study, 60 ESL students composed four in-class, 10-minute essays over two weeks. Half of the students revised their essays after receiving teacher feedback; the other half revised after reading aloud. All errors on initial and revised essays were tallied and normalized. Results showed that reading aloud affected some surface errors but that teacher feedback significantly outperformed reading aloud. We recommend teachers use reading aloud as a supplementary or preliminary strategy for correcting surface errors but not as a replacement for expert feedback provision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of TESL-EJ is the property of TESL-EJ and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Education Research Complete

Description
Abstract:	Students are often encouraged to proofread their writing by reading it aloud. Presumably, this will allow writers to correct local errors. Yet even though this strategy may be effective for native speakers, there is little empirical evidence of its benefit among second language writers. Therefore, we wondered how many errors second language students could correct through reading aloud and how that compared when receiving teacher feedback. In this study, 60 ESL students composed four in-class, 10-minute essays over two weeks. Half of the students revised their essays after receiving teacher feedback; the other half revised after reading aloud. All errors on initial and revised essays were tallied and normalized. Results showed that reading aloud affected some surface errors but that teacher feedback significantly outperformed reading aloud. We recommend teachers use reading aloud as a supplementary or preliminary strategy for correcting surface errors but not as a replacement for expert feedback provision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	10724303
DOI:	10.55593/ej.28112a5