Integración de las ideas de Ivan Illich y Paulo Freire en la Educación Superior.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Integración de las ideas de Ivan Illich y Paulo Freire en la Educación Superior.
Alternate Title: Integrating the Ideas of Ivan Illich and Paulo Freire into Higher Education.
Authors: Hernandez Quintero, Julian Andrés1 julianhqz@gmail.com
Source: Revista Horizontes Pedagógicos. jul-dic2024, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p55-61. 7p.
Abstract (English): The integration of Ivan Illich's and Paulo Freire's ideas into higher education represents an opportunity to radically transform the educational approach towards a more humanistic and emancipatory model. Ivan Illich in his critique of the institutionalization of education argues that modern schools act more as instruments of social control than as spaces for genuine learning. Paulo Freire, on the other hand, promotes a liberating education through dialogue and conscientization, challenging the traditional "banking" model of education where knowledge is passively deposited into students. Implementing these ideas in higher education requires a curriculum redesign that allows for self-managed learning and the creation of collaborative learning networks. Freire's dialogical approach implies a change in the teacher-student relationship, promoting the co-creation of knowledge through dialogue and critical reflection. The relevance and contextualization of educational content is another crucial aspect, facilitated through community projects and local case studies that allow students to apply their knowledge in real situations. Participatory evaluation is another key component, fostering continuous and collaborative assessment. Criticism of these proposals points to challenges in their practical feasibility, preparation of students and educators, and availability of resources. Despite these challenges, the combination of Illich's and Freire's ideas offers an educational model that promotes autonomy, creativity, and critical consciousness, contributing to social transformation. Implementing this approach requires curricular flexibility, teacher training, participatory evaluation, and the use of technologies and community projects, creating an educational system that not only fosters individual development but also contributes to social transformation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Abstract (Spanish): La integración de las ideas de Ivan Illich y Paulo Freire en la educación superior representa una oportunidad para transformar radicalmente el enfoque educativo hacia uno más humanista y emancipador. Ivan Illich en su crítica a la institucionalización de la educación argumenta que las escuelas modernas actúan más como instrumentos de control social que como espacios de verdadero aprendizaje. Por su parte, Paulo Freire promueve una educación liberadora a través del diálogo y la concientización, desafiando el modelo tradicional de educación bancaria donde el conocimiento es depositado pasivamente en los estudiantes. La implementación de estas ideas en la educación superior requiere un rediseño del currículo que permita la autogestión del aprendizaje y la creación de redes de aprendizaje colaborativo. El enfoque dialogal de Freire implica un cambio en la relación entre maestros y estudiantes, promoviendo la co-creación del conocimiento a través del diálogo y la reflexión crítica. La relevancia y contextualización del contenido educativo es otro aspecto crucial, facilitado mediante proyectos comunitarios y estudios de caso locales que permiten a los estudiantes aplicar sus conocimientos en situaciones reales. La evaluación participativa es otro componente clave, fomentando una evaluación continua y colaborativa. La crítica a estas propuestas señala desafíos en su viabilidad práctica, preparación de estudiantes y educadores, y disponibilidad de recursos. A pesar de estos desafíos, la combinación de las ideas de Illich y Freire ofrece un modelo educativo que promueve la autonomía, la creatividad y la conciencia crítica, contribuyendo a la transformación social. Implementar este enfoque requiere flexibilidad curricular, formación del profesorado, evaluación participativa y uso de tecnologías y proyectos comunitarios, creando un sistema educativo que no solo fomente el desarrollo individual, sino que también contribuya a la transformación social. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Revista Horizontes Pedagógicos is the property of Corporacion Universitaria Iberoamericana, Facultad Ciencias de la Educacion and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:The integration of Ivan Illich's and Paulo Freire's ideas into higher education represents an opportunity to radically transform the educational approach towards a more humanistic and emancipatory model. Ivan Illich in his critique of the institutionalization of education argues that modern schools act more as instruments of social control than as spaces for genuine learning. Paulo Freire, on the other hand, promotes a liberating education through dialogue and conscientization, challenging the traditional "banking" model of education where knowledge is passively deposited into students. Implementing these ideas in higher education requires a curriculum redesign that allows for self-managed learning and the creation of collaborative learning networks. Freire's dialogical approach implies a change in the teacher-student relationship, promoting the co-creation of knowledge through dialogue and critical reflection. The relevance and contextualization of educational content is another crucial aspect, facilitated through community projects and local case studies that allow students to apply their knowledge in real situations. Participatory evaluation is another key component, fostering continuous and collaborative assessment. Criticism of these proposals points to challenges in their practical feasibility, preparation of students and educators, and availability of resources. Despite these challenges, the combination of Illich's and Freire's ideas offers an educational model that promotes autonomy, creativity, and critical consciousness, contributing to social transformation. Implementing this approach requires curricular flexibility, teacher training, participatory evaluation, and the use of technologies and community projects, creating an educational system that not only fosters individual development but also contributes to social transformation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:01238264
DOI:10.33881/0123-8264.hop.26206