Preregistration in Evaluation: Lessons About Preregistration of Outcomes and Analytic Protocols From a National Job Training Program Evaluation.
Saved in:
| Title: | Preregistration in Evaluation: Lessons About Preregistration of Outcomes and Analytic Protocols From a National Job Training Program Evaluation. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Peck, Laura R.1 (AUTHOR) professorpeck@gmail.com, Litwok, Daniel2 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | New Directions for Evaluation. Dec2024, Vol. 2024 Issue 184, p47-55. 9p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Open scholarship, *Occupational training, *Evaluators, Legal evidence |
| Abstract: | This article explores the application of open science practices, focusing on the challenges, barriers, and lessons learned from preregistering outcomes and analytic protocols in impact evaluation. Using the Health Profession Opportunity Grants (HPOG) Program Impact Study as a case study, we illustrate the balance between pre‐specifying research plans and maintaining flexibility to adapt to unexpected findings. We discuss how preregistration can enhance transparency, credibility, and the overall quality of evidence, as well as practical considerations for future evaluations. Our insights aim to guide evaluators in applying open science principles to improve the rigor and integrity of impact evaluations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of New Directions for Evaluation is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | This article explores the application of open science practices, focusing on the challenges, barriers, and lessons learned from preregistering outcomes and analytic protocols in impact evaluation. Using the Health Profession Opportunity Grants (HPOG) Program Impact Study as a case study, we illustrate the balance between pre‐specifying research plans and maintaining flexibility to adapt to unexpected findings. We discuss how preregistration can enhance transparency, credibility, and the overall quality of evidence, as well as practical considerations for future evaluations. Our insights aim to guide evaluators in applying open science principles to improve the rigor and integrity of impact evaluations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 10976736 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/ev.20623 |
