Bibliographic Details
| Title: |
Forensic Linguistics of Hate Speech on Social Media against President Joko Widodo by Chairman of UGM's Student Executive Board. |
| Alternate Title: |
Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial terhadap Presiden Joko Widodo oleh Ketua Badan Eksekutif Mahasiswa UGM: Kajian Linguistik Forensik. |
| Authors: |
Rahmayantis, Marista Dwi1 maristadwi@unpkediri.ac.id, Pitoyo, Andri1 andri.pitoyo12@gmail.com, Sujarwoko1 sujarwoko@unpkediri.ac.id, Putra, Chelya Ilham Ramdani1 chelyailham04@gmail.com, Firmansyah, Achmad Fathoni1 achmadfatoni51@gmail.com |
| Source: |
Kembara: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya. Apr2025, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p456-468. 13p. |
| Subject Terms: |
Communication in law, Hate speech, Legal norms, Fake news, Democracy, Hate |
| People: |
Joko Widodo, 1961- |
| Abstract (English): |
This research discusses the hate speech delivered by the chairman of BEM UGM against President Joko Widodo, uploaded on social media. This research uses a forensic linguistic approach to examine the forms of hate speech by the BEM UGM chairman against President Joko Widodo. The urgency lies in understanding the impact of hate speech on social media to prevent conflicts and law violations. This research used a descriptive qualitative method with a data collection technique through the Listening-Taking Note method. Data were obtained from video transcriptions and social media posts containing the statement of the Chairman of BEM UGM. Furthermore, the data were analyzed by classifying it based on five forms of hate speech. The results show that there are five forms of hate speech delivered by the Chairman of BEM UGM against President Joko Widodo: (1) hate speech in the form of insults, such as calling the President a 'Javanese Machiavelli' and using derogatory words; (2) hate speech in the form of defamation, such as accusations of being a 'ruler who destroys the democratic system'; (3) hate speech in the form of provocation, such as calls to fight the government; (4) hate speech in the form of spreading false news, such as the issue of a three-term presidency and accusations of nepotism; and (5) hate speech in the form of unpleasant actions, such as the installation of billboards calling the President 'the most embarrassing UGM alumni'. The findings also show that these hate speeches are often not supported by factual evidence, so they are assumptions and slander. Thus, this research illustrates the importance of awareness in using social media wisely so as not to violate legal norms and communication ethics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Indonesian): |
Penelitian ini membahas tentang ujaran kebencian yang disampaikan oleh ketua BEM UGM terhadap Presiden Joko Widodo yang diunggah di media sosial. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat bentuk-bentuk ujaran kebencian yang disampaikan oleh ketua BEM UGM terhadap Presiden Joko Widodo dengan menggunakan pendekatan linguistik forensik. Urgensinya terletak pada pentingnya memahami dampak ujaran kebencian di media sosial untuk mencegah konflik dan pelanggaran hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui metode Simak-Catat (Listening-Taking Note). Data diperoleh dari transkripsi video dan unggahan media sosial yang memuat pernyataan Ketua BEM UGM. Selanjutnya, data dianalisis dengan mengklasifikasinya berdasarkan lima bentuk ujaran kebencian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada lima bentuk ujaran kebencian yang disampaikan oleh Ketua BEM UGM terhadap Presiden Joko Widodo: (1) ujaran kebencian berupa penghinaan, seperti menyebut Presiden sebagai "Javanese Machiavelli" dan menggunakan kata-kata merendahkan; (2) ujaran kebencian berupa pencemaran nama baik, seperti tuduhan sebagai "penguasa yang merusak sistem demokrasi"; (3) ujaran kebencian berupa provokasi, seperti ajakan untuk melawan pemerintah; (4) ujaran kebencian berupa penyebaran berita bohong, seperti isu masa jabatan presiden tiga periode dan tuduhan nepotisme; serta (5) ujaran kebencian berupa perbuatan tidak menyenangkan, seperti pemasangan baliho yang menyebut Presiden sebagai "alumni UGM paling memalukan". Temuan penelitian ini juga menunjukkan bahwa ujaran kebencian tersebut sering kali tidak didukung oleh bukti faktual, sehingga bersifat asumsi dan fitnah. Dengan demikian, penelitian ini memberikan gambaran tentang pentingnya kesadaran dalam menggunakan media sosial secara bijak agar tidak melanggar norma hukum dan etika komunikasi. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Kembara: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya is the property of Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| Database: |
Education Research Complete |
