Sources within sources: The dynamic influence of multiple documents trustworthiness when evaluating and using an embedded source.
Saved in:
| Title: | Sources within sources: The dynamic influence of multiple documents trustworthiness when evaluating and using an embedded source. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Londra, Franco1,2 (AUTHOR) franco_londra@uca.edu.ar, Martínez, Magalí2,3 (AUTHOR), Saux, Gaston1,2 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Metacognition & Learning. 6/26/2025, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p1-22. 22p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Information resources, *Metadata, *Undergraduates, Trust, Internet |
| Abstract: | The thoughtful use of information sources to assess the trustworthiness of documents has been highlighted as a metacognitive strategy when reading complex or little-known topics on the internet. Prior studies indicate that readers can use document sources (i.e., metadata about the document) to ponder their evaluation of other sources embedded in those documents (i.e., entities referred to in the text as the origin of an idea). This study aimed to expand on those findings by examining the dynamics of such evaluations and the use of information provided by a single source when embedded in multiple document sources, which can vary (or not) in trustworthiness. Seventy-seven undergraduates, M = 23.84 years, read two texts on a health topic to write an essay. Each participant read the texts in one of four sequences that determined the trustworthiness of the document sources and their order of presentation. High-trust document sources were referred to more often in written productions than low-trust sources, and the information they provided was considered better than information in low-trust document sources. Additionally, the trustworthiness evaluation of the embedded source did not change when both document sources presented similar trustworthiness levels. In contrast, when trustworthiness varied across documents, the evaluation of the embedded source fluctuated: it increased when last mentioned in a high-trust document, and it decreased when last mentioned in a low-trust document. These results are interpreted in terms of the complex dynamics of reader-guided processing and, specifically, source-guided evaluations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Metacognition & Learning is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | The thoughtful use of information sources to assess the trustworthiness of documents has been highlighted as a metacognitive strategy when reading complex or little-known topics on the internet. Prior studies indicate that readers can use document sources (i.e., metadata about the document) to ponder their evaluation of other sources embedded in those documents (i.e., entities referred to in the text as the origin of an idea). This study aimed to expand on those findings by examining the dynamics of such evaluations and the use of information provided by a single source when embedded in multiple document sources, which can vary (or not) in trustworthiness. Seventy-seven undergraduates, M = 23.84 years, read two texts on a health topic to write an essay. Each participant read the texts in one of four sequences that determined the trustworthiness of the document sources and their order of presentation. High-trust document sources were referred to more often in written productions than low-trust sources, and the information they provided was considered better than information in low-trust document sources. Additionally, the trustworthiness evaluation of the embedded source did not change when both document sources presented similar trustworthiness levels. In contrast, when trustworthiness varied across documents, the evaluation of the embedded source fluctuated: it increased when last mentioned in a high-trust document, and it decreased when last mentioned in a low-trust document. These results are interpreted in terms of the complex dynamics of reader-guided processing and, specifically, source-guided evaluations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 15561623 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11409-025-09427-z |
