Formal and Natural Supports: Perspectives From Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Family Members, and Support Workers.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Formal and Natural Supports: Perspectives From Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, Family Members, and Support Workers.
Authors: Aldersey, Heather Michelle1 hma@queensu.ca, Xu, Xiaolin1, Piccone, Caitlin1, Nelson, Monique2, Thomson, Donna3, Pauls, Rebecca4, Perry, Linda5
Source: Journal of Policy & Practice in Intellectual Disabilities. Jun2025, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p1-12. 12p.
Subject Terms: *Social workers, *Focus groups, *Government policy, *Communities, *Intellectual disabilities, *Developmental disabilities, *Family attitudes, *Research methodology, *Psychology of caregivers, *Family support, *Interpersonal relations, *People with disabilities, *Caregiver attitudes, Families & psychology, Research funding, Interviewing, Services for caregivers, Human rights, Patients' attitudes
Geographic Terms: China
Abstract: People with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families often utilize disability‐related supports to navigate their lives in the community. These supports can come from formal (paid) and natural (unpaid) sources. It is important to understand people's experiences navigating both types of supports within the support ecosystem. To that end, we conducted six focus groups (4‐7 participants each) comprising 9 persons with disabilities, 10 family members, and 15 formal support providers to understand the following: (a) What are the experiences of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their family members in engaging with both natural and formal support systems in British Columbia and Ontario, Canada? (b) How might current disability‐related support systems in Canada be improved to better enable adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families to live good lives? Findings indicated the importance of approaching supports from a human rights‐based (rather than a deficit‐based) approach and highlighted the critical importance of relationships and community connections. Findings affirmed that integration of both formal and natural supports is essential, with formal supports often facilitating and enabling natural support networks to flourish. Some participants reflected on how challenging it is to create and maintain natural support networks and believed that much of the work to do this still remains with parents, in spite of efforts to expand circles of support. Finally, findings highlighted systemic barriers and policy hurdles that individuals and families experienced when trying to secure the support they needed and wanted, particularly when transitioning from child to adult formal support systems. We argue that flexibility of government funding, enhancement of community connections, and focus on transition between service systems will be essential in enabling individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families to live their best lives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Policy & Practice in Intellectual Disabilities is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:People with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families often utilize disability‐related supports to navigate their lives in the community. These supports can come from formal (paid) and natural (unpaid) sources. It is important to understand people's experiences navigating both types of supports within the support ecosystem. To that end, we conducted six focus groups (4‐7 participants each) comprising 9 persons with disabilities, 10 family members, and 15 formal support providers to understand the following: (a) What are the experiences of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their family members in engaging with both natural and formal support systems in British Columbia and Ontario, Canada? (b) How might current disability‐related support systems in Canada be improved to better enable adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families to live good lives? Findings indicated the importance of approaching supports from a human rights‐based (rather than a deficit‐based) approach and highlighted the critical importance of relationships and community connections. Findings affirmed that integration of both formal and natural supports is essential, with formal supports often facilitating and enabling natural support networks to flourish. Some participants reflected on how challenging it is to create and maintain natural support networks and believed that much of the work to do this still remains with parents, in spite of efforts to expand circles of support. Finally, findings highlighted systemic barriers and policy hurdles that individuals and families experienced when trying to secure the support they needed and wanted, particularly when transitioning from child to adult formal support systems. We argue that flexibility of government funding, enhancement of community connections, and focus on transition between service systems will be essential in enabling individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families to live their best lives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:17411122
DOI:10.1111/jppi.70011