View in EDS

Locking antlers: A 'levels of conflict' analysis of upland deer management in the Scottish Highlands.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Locking antlers: A 'levels of conflict' analysis of upland deer management in the Scottish Highlands.
Authors: Leavey-Wilson, Callum1 (AUTHOR) callum.leavey-wilson@ed.ac.uk, Fisher, Janet1 (AUTHOR) Janet.Fisher@ed.ac.uk, Staddon, Sam1 (AUTHOR) Sam.Staddon@ed.ac.uk
Source: Journal of Rural Studies. Oct2025, Vol. 119, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Subject Terms: *Conflict (Psychology), Conflict theory, Rural land use, Identity (Psychology), Stakeholder analysis, Deer populations, Uplands, Wildlife management
Geographic Terms: Highlands (Scotland)
Abstract: Conflicts over the use and management of rural land, wildlife and other natural resources tend to involve multiple layers of contention, beyond the issues that are most readily observable. We illustrate this in the case of upland deer management in the Scottish Highlands, which has been the subject of fierce debate for many years. Drawing on the perspectives of a wide range of stakeholders and applying an adapted 'levels of conflict' framework, we show that whilst the superficial manifestation of this dispute concerns deer numbers, their impacts and methods of management, beneath this sit underlying factors of historical controversy, blame and mistrust between parties as well as tensions around the individual and collective identities of stakeholders in a changing rural landscape. The framework acts as a useful tool that reconfirms the complexities of this case whilst allowing them to be more easily understood, providing a fresh insight into this long-running issue. • Novel application of 'levels of conflict' framework to rural Scottish case study. • Technical issues underlain by distrust and clashing identities amidst rural change. • Reconfirms complexities of case in a more easily understandable format. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Rural Studies is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:Conflicts over the use and management of rural land, wildlife and other natural resources tend to involve multiple layers of contention, beyond the issues that are most readily observable. We illustrate this in the case of upland deer management in the Scottish Highlands, which has been the subject of fierce debate for many years. Drawing on the perspectives of a wide range of stakeholders and applying an adapted 'levels of conflict' framework, we show that whilst the superficial manifestation of this dispute concerns deer numbers, their impacts and methods of management, beneath this sit underlying factors of historical controversy, blame and mistrust between parties as well as tensions around the individual and collective identities of stakeholders in a changing rural landscape. The framework acts as a useful tool that reconfirms the complexities of this case whilst allowing them to be more easily understood, providing a fresh insight into this long-running issue. • Novel application of 'levels of conflict' framework to rural Scottish case study. • Technical issues underlain by distrust and clashing identities amidst rural change. • Reconfirms complexities of case in a more easily understandable format. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:07430167
DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103793