Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of Good Death Research from 2001–2021.
Saved in:
| Title: | Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of Good Death Research from 2001–2021. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Hsieh, Ming-Hsuan1,2, Lin, Wei-Chih3, Yeh, Te-Chun1,4, Liu, Chia-Jen2,3, Chen, Mingchih2, Liu, Chih-Kuang2 059435@mail.fju.edu.tw |
| Source: | Omega: Journal of Death & Dying. Nov2025, Vol. 92 Issue 1, p378-394. 17p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Family attitudes, *Research, *Bibliometrics, Pearson correlation (Statistics), Attitudes toward death, Death, Statistical hypothesis testing, Palliative treatment, Advance directives (Medical care) |
| Geographic Terms: | Australia, East Asia, North America, Canada, United States, Taiwan, United Kingdom, China, Europe, Netherlands, Japan, Spain, Belgium |
| Abstract: | Quantitative analysis via bibliometric field analyses is a recent, gradually emerging method. We conducted a bibliometric study to investigate the authors' scientific influence and contributions and evaluate trends and research foci in good death-related literature using the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection. A total of 1,157 publications were selected for the analysis. There was a significant increase in annual publications per year (R 2 = 0.79). The publication (317, 27.4%) and average citation (29.2) numbers were highest in the USA. Controlling for population number and GDP, the Netherlands had the highest number of articles per million persons (5.89) and US$ 1010 GDP (1.02). North American and Western European countries are leaders in the field, but some East Asian countries (Japan and Taiwan) perform well. Current research focuses on patient perspectives of good death and advance care planning among patients, families, and health care providers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Omega: Journal of Death & Dying is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Quantitative analysis via bibliometric field analyses is a recent, gradually emerging method. We conducted a bibliometric study to investigate the authors' scientific influence and contributions and evaluate trends and research foci in good death-related literature using the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection. A total of 1,157 publications were selected for the analysis. There was a significant increase in annual publications per year (R 2 = 0.79). The publication (317, 27.4%) and average citation (29.2) numbers were highest in the USA. Controlling for population number and GDP, the Netherlands had the highest number of articles per million persons (5.89) and US$ 1010 GDP (1.02). North American and Western European countries are leaders in the field, but some East Asian countries (Japan and Taiwan) perform well. Current research focuses on patient perspectives of good death and advance care planning among patients, families, and health care providers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00302228 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/00302228231184301 |
