| Abstract: |
This study provides a syntactic analysis of modality in Modern Standard Arabic, distinguishing between epistemic and deontic/root modals and examining their structural properties within the framework of Cinque's (1999) hierarchy of modal heads. Using a corpus-based approach, this study analyzes how modality is marked in Arabic, which types of modals occupy higher syntactic positions, and the kinds of complements they select. The findings reveal that Arabic modals include verbs (e.g., yajib "must", yumkin "may"), prepositional phrases (mina al-dˤaruwrii "necessary"), particles (qad, rubbama), and prepositions (ʕala, al-lam). Epistemic modality, in particular, can be expressed through modal verbs such as yumkin "may" and yuħtamal "might"; prepositional phrases such as mina al-muʔakkadi "certainly" and mina al-muħtamali "likely"; and particles (qad + perfective), (qad + imperfective), rubbama "perhaps", and the verb yabdu "seem". The data confirm that epistemic modals occupy a structurally higher position than deontic modals, consistent with cross-linguistic typological trends. Additionally, modal verbs predominantly select complementizer phrase (CP) complements (e.g., ʔan + verb phrase (VP)) over noun phrase (NP) complements, indicating a syntactic preference that contrasts with that in English. The results indicate that Arabic aligns with Cinque's hierarchy, with obligation modals (e.g., yajib "must") ranking higher than ability/permission modals (e.g., yaqdir "can"). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|
Copyright of Journal of Language Teaching & Research is the property of Academy Publication Co., LTD and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
