Manufactured crisis: A response to Al-Hoorie et al. (2024).

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Manufactured crisis: A response to Al-Hoorie et al. (2024).
Authors: Papi, Mostafa1 (AUTHOR) mpapi@fsu.edu, Teimouri, Yasser2 (AUTHOR)
Source: Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Sep2024, Vol. 47 Issue 4, p1096-1107. 12p.
Subject Terms: *Test validity, *Motivation (Psychology), *Data analysis, Critical analysis, Hypothesis
Geographic Terms: South Korea
Abstract: Based on correlational and factorial analysis of data collected from 384 middle and high school students in South Korea, Al–Hoorie et al. (2024) claimed the existence of a discriminant validity crisis within the L2 motivational self-system research tradition and advocated for abandoning research in this area. In this response, we critically examined the evidence presented, re-analyzed their data, and argued that their findings actually support the discriminant validity of the target scales. We also discussed issues related to the design and implementation of their study and refuted their assertion regarding a discriminant validity crisis in this field. Finally, we emphasized the necessity of prioritizing definitional validity in the ongoing methodological reforms of L2 motivation research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Studies in Second Language Acquisition is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:Based on correlational and factorial analysis of data collected from 384 middle and high school students in South Korea, Al–Hoorie et al. (2024) claimed the existence of a discriminant validity crisis within the L2 motivational self-system research tradition and advocated for abandoning research in this area. In this response, we critically examined the evidence presented, re-analyzed their data, and argued that their findings actually support the discriminant validity of the target scales. We also discussed issues related to the design and implementation of their study and refuted their assertion regarding a discriminant validity crisis in this field. Finally, we emphasized the necessity of prioritizing definitional validity in the ongoing methodological reforms of L2 motivation research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:02722631
DOI:10.1017/S0272263124000494