PACKAGED WIDGETS: EVALUATING A CONCEPT FOR FAIR EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY COMPONENTS.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	PACKAGED WIDGETS: EVALUATING A CONCEPT FOR FAIR EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY COMPONENTS.
Authors:	Salmen, Frederic¹ salmen@cs.rwth-aachen.de, Görzen, Sergej¹ goerzen@cs.rwth-aachen.de, Röpke, René² rene.roepke@tuwien.ac.at, Schroeder, Ulrik¹ schroeder@cs.rwth-aachen.de
Source:	Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on Cognition & Exploratory Learning in Digital Age. 2025, p31-40. 10p.
Subject Terms:	*Educational technology, Computer software usability, User-centered system design, Fairness
Abstract:	FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) research data including software have become a major point of discussion for the educational technology (EdTech) community in recent years. For software, the community has been investigating these issues since its inception in the 90s and 2000s, first starting with learning objects. In this article, we present the idea of packaged widgets, a novel technical solution to the challenge of FAIRness--specifically for web-based EdTech. Packaged widgets make use of state-of-the-art approaches from web development, such as web components and NodeJS packages. We argue that this approach leads to an increase of FAIRness compared to existing, more isolated solutions. To show the viability of this approach, we present a study which follows n=11 students developing EdTech prototypes in the packaged widget format. A mixed-method approach is used that considers qualitative interview data, and the developer experience quantified with the extended user experience questionnaire (UEQ+). Results showed high usability for a prototype (apart from minor bugs), and no barriers to expressivity for STEM subjects, with students being able to implement a wide range of packaged widgets -- indicating that the packaged widget concept is not only FAIR, but also viable for EdTech. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on Cognition & Exploratory Learning in Digital Age is the property of International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Education Research Complete

Description
Abstract:	FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) research data including software have become a major point of discussion for the educational technology (EdTech) community in recent years. For software, the community has been investigating these issues since its inception in the 90s and 2000s, first starting with learning objects. In this article, we present the idea of packaged widgets, a novel technical solution to the challenge of FAIRness--specifically for web-based EdTech. Packaged widgets make use of state-of-the-art approaches from web development, such as web components and NodeJS packages. We argue that this approach leads to an increase of FAIRness compared to existing, more isolated solutions. To show the viability of this approach, we present a study which follows n=11 students developing EdTech prototypes in the packaged widget format. A mixed-method approach is used that considers qualitative interview data, and the developer experience quantified with the extended user experience questionnaire (UEQ+). Results showed high usability for a prototype (apart from minor bugs), and no barriers to expressivity for STEM subjects, with students being able to implement a wide range of packaged widgets -- indicating that the packaged widget concept is not only FAIR, but also viable for EdTech. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]