View in EDS

Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework on Physics Laboratory Learning in Higher Education.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework on Physics Laboratory Learning in Higher Education.
Authors: Chunhao, Cheng1 P127074@siswa.ukm.edu.my, Halim, Lilia1 lilia@ukm.edu.my, Arsad, Nurazidawati Mohamad1 azidarsad@ukm.edu.my
Source: International Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Learning. Dec2025, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p261-286. 26p.
Subject Terms: *Learning laboratories, *Higher education, *Educational outcomes, *Teaching methods, Evidence gaps, Physics
Abstract: Instructional laboratories are a key component of the physics curriculum and have long been valued for their educational significance. The expense of maintaining them and ongoing debates about their effectiveness highlight the need for research. However, there is a notable lack of focused efforts to identify the factors that make instructional laboratories effective in enhancing learning at the higher education level. Therefore, this study conducted a systematic review (2013–2023) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines of studies on the impact of face-to-face laboratory activities on physics learning in higher education and to identify efficacy factors. Analyzing fifty-nine studies from WoS, SCOPUS, and EBSCO, six research scopes were identified: pedagogical strategies, students’ perspective, laboratories comparison, instrument development, instructor’s behavior, and gender. Three challenges were established: lack of training for new instructors, independent learning opportunities for students, and clarity in laboratory teaching and learning goals. In terms of learning outcomes, the studies reviewed focused on investigating affective factors, students’ views about the nature of science, and the importance of experimental physics. Finally, a framework outlining input, process, and output for laboratory teaching and learning was developed, highlighting research gaps and offering conceptual directions for improving pedagogy and advancing future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of International Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Learning is the property of Common Ground Research Networks and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:Instructional laboratories are a key component of the physics curriculum and have long been valued for their educational significance. The expense of maintaining them and ongoing debates about their effectiveness highlight the need for research. However, there is a notable lack of focused efforts to identify the factors that make instructional laboratories effective in enhancing learning at the higher education level. Therefore, this study conducted a systematic review (2013–2023) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines of studies on the impact of face-to-face laboratory activities on physics learning in higher education and to identify efficacy factors. Analyzing fifty-nine studies from WoS, SCOPUS, and EBSCO, six research scopes were identified: pedagogical strategies, students’ perspective, laboratories comparison, instrument development, instructor’s behavior, and gender. Three challenges were established: lack of training for new instructors, independent learning opportunities for students, and clarity in laboratory teaching and learning goals. In terms of learning outcomes, the studies reviewed focused on investigating affective factors, students’ views about the nature of science, and the importance of experimental physics. Finally, a framework outlining input, process, and output for laboratory teaching and learning was developed, highlighting research gaps and offering conceptual directions for improving pedagogy and advancing future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:23277971
DOI:10.18848/2327-7971/CGP/v32i02/261-286