Developing and Validating the Susceptibility to Pseudoscience Scale.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Title:	Developing and Validating the Susceptibility to Pseudoscience Scale.
Authors:	Thome, Emma Kate¹ emmakate.thome@boystown.org, Finn, Patrick¹
Source:	American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. Jan2026, Vol. 35 Issue 1, p317-339. 23p.
Subject Terms:	Data analysis, Research methodology evaluation, Undergraduates, Speech-language pathology, Experimental design, Communicative disorders, Research methodology, Research, Clinical competence, Inter-observer reliability, Multitrait multimethod techniques, Pearson correlation (Statistics), Research evaluation, Visual analog scale, Questionnaires, Descriptive statistics, Psychometrics, Statistics
Abstract:	Purpose: Pseudoscientific treatments in the helping professions can harm clinicians and clients. Although some clinicians may be familiar with the warning signs of pseudoscience, little research has examined which warning signs are most difficult for clinicians to identify. This study aimed to develop and validate the Susceptibility to Pseudoscience (STOP) scale and explore participant performance on the scale. Method: The STOP scale consists of 10 hypothetical clinical scenarios reflecting common warning signs of pseudoscience. Content validity was evaluated by three experts, while convergent and divergent validity were assessed using seven related scales completed by 82 undergraduate students in communication sciences and disorders or special education. Think-aloud protocols with five undergraduates explored construct validity. Additionally, performance on the scale was examined among undergraduates and six practicing speechlanguage pathologists (SLPs). Results: Experts matched the warning signs of pseudoscience to the STOP scale scenarios for all but one item. Significant positive correlations emerged between scores on the STOP scale and scores on the Need for Cognition– Short Form, the Scientific Reasoning Scale, and the Actively Open-Minded Thinking Scale–Short Form. Conversely, significant negative correlations were found between scores on the STOP scale and scores on the Pseudoscience Endorsement Scale, the Rational–Experiential Inventory, and the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale. Think-aloud responses aligned with a three-stage model of the dual-process theory. Undergraduates and SLPs showed similarities and differences in recognizing the warning signs of pseudoscience. Conclusions: The STOP scale is a promising tool for assessing students’ and clinicians’ ability to detect the warning signs of pseudoscience. Findings highlight the need for targeted education to enhance pseudoscience detection among these groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
	Copyright of American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database:	Education Research Complete

Description
Abstract:	Purpose: Pseudoscientific treatments in the helping professions can harm clinicians and clients. Although some clinicians may be familiar with the warning signs of pseudoscience, little research has examined which warning signs are most difficult for clinicians to identify. This study aimed to develop and validate the Susceptibility to Pseudoscience (STOP) scale and explore participant performance on the scale. Method: The STOP scale consists of 10 hypothetical clinical scenarios reflecting common warning signs of pseudoscience. Content validity was evaluated by three experts, while convergent and divergent validity were assessed using seven related scales completed by 82 undergraduate students in communication sciences and disorders or special education. Think-aloud protocols with five undergraduates explored construct validity. Additionally, performance on the scale was examined among undergraduates and six practicing speechlanguage pathologists (SLPs). Results: Experts matched the warning signs of pseudoscience to the STOP scale scenarios for all but one item. Significant positive correlations emerged between scores on the STOP scale and scores on the Need for Cognition– Short Form, the Scientific Reasoning Scale, and the Actively Open-Minded Thinking Scale–Short Form. Conversely, significant negative correlations were found between scores on the STOP scale and scores on the Pseudoscience Endorsement Scale, the Rational–Experiential Inventory, and the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale. Think-aloud responses aligned with a three-stage model of the dual-process theory. Undergraduates and SLPs showed similarities and differences in recognizing the warning signs of pseudoscience. Conclusions: The STOP scale is a promising tool for assessing students’ and clinicians’ ability to detect the warning signs of pseudoscience. Findings highlight the need for targeted education to enhance pseudoscience detection among these groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:	10580360
DOI:	10.1044/2025_AJSLP-25-00166