Reflections on the First Decade of ERPO Laws: History, Lessons Learned, and Thoughts for the Future.
Saved in:
| Title: | Reflections on the First Decade of ERPO Laws: History, Lessons Learned, and Thoughts for the Future. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Frattaroli, Shannon1 (AUTHOR) sfratta1@jhu.edu, Horwitz, Joshua1 (AUTHOR), Swanson, Jeffrey W.2 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Inquiry (00469580). 2/27/2026, Vol. 63, p1-7. 7p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Policy sciences, *Human services programs, *Diffusion of innovations, *Occupational roles, Gun laws, Risk management in business, Science, Affinity groups, Reflection (Philosophy), Shootings (Crime), Coalitions, Authority |
| Geographic Terms: | United States |
| Abstract: | This article focuses on the development, dissemination, implementation, and evaluation of Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs), civil restraining orders that temporarily restrict firearm access for individuals deemed at risk of violence. Originating after the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, ERPO laws were recommended by the Consortium for Risk-Based Firearm Policy, which emphasized evidence-based criteria for firearm restrictions rather than mental illness diagnoses alone. Since the first enactment in California in 2014, 22 states, the District of Columbia, and the Virgin Islands have adopted ERPO laws, supported by coordinated educational efforts, research, and technical assistance to promote effective implementation. The article highlights the critical role of multidisciplinary collaboration among researchers, advocates, and policymakers in translating scientific evidence into policy and practice to address gun violence as a public health issue. [Extracted from the article] |
| Copyright of Inquiry (00469580) is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | This article focuses on the development, dissemination, implementation, and evaluation of Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs), civil restraining orders that temporarily restrict firearm access for individuals deemed at risk of violence. Originating after the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, ERPO laws were recommended by the Consortium for Risk-Based Firearm Policy, which emphasized evidence-based criteria for firearm restrictions rather than mental illness diagnoses alone. Since the first enactment in California in 2014, 22 states, the District of Columbia, and the Virgin Islands have adopted ERPO laws, supported by coordinated educational efforts, research, and technical assistance to promote effective implementation. The article highlights the critical role of multidisciplinary collaboration among researchers, advocates, and policymakers in translating scientific evidence into policy and practice to address gun violence as a public health issue. [Extracted from the article] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00469580 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/00469580261427668 |
