View in EDS

ChatGPT Over My Friends: Japanese English-as-a-Foreign-Language Learners' Preferences for Editing and Proofreading Strategies.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: ChatGPT Over My Friends: Japanese English-as-a-Foreign-Language Learners' Preferences for Editing and Proofreading Strategies.
Authors: Allen, Todd J1 (AUTHOR) tjallen@kansai-u.ac.jp, Mizumoto, Atsushi1 (AUTHOR)
Source: RELC Journal. Apr2026, Vol. 57 Issue 1, p89-106. 18p.
Subject Terms: *Tutors & tutoring, *Academic discourse, *English as a foreign language, *Writers' workshops, *Second language acquisition, ChatGPT, Proofreading, Artificial intelligence & ethics
Abstract: This study contrasts 33 Japanese English-as-a-foreign-language learners' experiences using writing groups and artificial intelligence technology (ChatGPT-3.5) for editing and proofreading academic writing assignments. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence technology have significantly influenced academic writing, teaching and learning, prompting researchers to explore the practical application of these technologies in educational settings. In this study, participants edited and proofread their writing in class by using a writing group and experimenting with ChatGPT. After each activity, participants answered a questionnaire about their experiences. In the final questionnaire, participants compared their experiences of each activity and reported on which one they preferred. The results indicate that students mostly prefer using artificial intelligence technology for editing and proofreading. However, they acknowledge some value in writing groups. They assert that technology provides effective feedback, improving clarity and cohesion in their writing. Additionally, the findings reveal preferences for specific prompts to enhance their writing. Overall, this research demonstrates how teachers can use artificial intelligence in language classrooms to improve writing and practices, while emphasizing the importance of ethical implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of RELC Journal is the property of Sage Publications, Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Description
Abstract:This study contrasts 33 Japanese English-as-a-foreign-language learners' experiences using writing groups and artificial intelligence technology (ChatGPT-3.5) for editing and proofreading academic writing assignments. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence technology have significantly influenced academic writing, teaching and learning, prompting researchers to explore the practical application of these technologies in educational settings. In this study, participants edited and proofread their writing in class by using a writing group and experimenting with ChatGPT. After each activity, participants answered a questionnaire about their experiences. In the final questionnaire, participants compared their experiences of each activity and reported on which one they preferred. The results indicate that students mostly prefer using artificial intelligence technology for editing and proofreading. However, they acknowledge some value in writing groups. They assert that technology provides effective feedback, improving clarity and cohesion in their writing. Additionally, the findings reveal preferences for specific prompts to enhance their writing. Overall, this research demonstrates how teachers can use artificial intelligence in language classrooms to improve writing and practices, while emphasizing the importance of ethical implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:00336882
DOI:10.1177/00336882241262533